Yuki, thainks for explaining in more detail what you are wanting In that case you would want to use my first email method and instead of Lastvalue(open>value) use lastvalue(TimeFrameGetPrice( "O", inDaily, 0 ) >value)
-- Cheers Graham AB-Write >< Professional AFL Writing Service Yes, I write AFL code to your requirements http://www.aflwriting.com On 17/01/07, Yuki Taga <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi Graham, > > Wednesday, January 17, 2007, 11:17:12 AM, you wrote: > > G> you would need to place it within a loop if you want to do this for > G> range of bars, although I am not certain how it would go with a > G> dynamiccally changing watchlist > G> You would be better to just add this condition to your trade signals > G> to ensure that is ignored for that symbol > > You lost me. ^_^ > > What I have here is a watchlist of potential setups from the night > before. But today's Open is the last qualifying hurdle the setup > needs to pass to remain alive. > > Since today's Open is a known value that, once obtained, will not > change, I can't understand why AFL would not let me strip a number of > symbols from the watchlist based on some condition applied to the > Open. > > The watchlist would only change once, after running the exploration. > The Open is, after all, unchangeable, yes? We have a statement that > expresses an unchanging value that needs to be compared to the Open, > which, once known, also doesn't change. Pass or Fail, isn't it? > > Yuki > > > > Please note that this group is for discussion between users only. > > To get support from AmiBroker please send an e-mail directly to > SUPPORT {at} amibroker.com > > For NEW RELEASE ANNOUNCEMENTS and other news always check DEVLOG: > http://www.amibroker.com/devlog/ > > For other support material please check also: > http://www.amibroker.com/support.html > > Yahoo! Groups Links > > > >
