You might consider a new folder under Formulas titled "Inactive" and even 
sub-folders.  Put unused indicators in that folder and either forget about them 
or delete whenever you are sure they are no longer needed.  I prefer this to 
the Indicator Maintenance wizard approach.

Bill
  ----- Original Message ----- 
  From: Ken Close 
  To: [email protected] 
  Sent: Wednesday, February 07, 2007 11:24 AM
  Subject: [amibroker] Free Space for Indicators


  I have gone back and searched the messages for "Indicator Maintenance" and 
saw descriptions of how to use it but not much else.

  I know how to use it but I have not found any strategies for either expanding 
it, or avoiding "inconvenient" loss of an important indicator.

  Now, you might say that if these are unused indicators how can they be 
important...but I have numbers of indicators which I do not want to lose yet I 
do not want to individually go and look at each one to see if it is a candidate 
for deletion.

  Do people keep copies of all of their indicators somewhere outside of the 
Amibroker file structure?

  I do not understand this limitation of Amibroker and I hope TJ gives a brief 
description of why it is a limitation and what one can do to preserve multiple 
hundreds if not thousands of indicator files.

  This is a priority for me right now because I am bumping into the "You have 
run out of free indicator space" every other day.  I go and run the Wizard, 
can't really decide which to delete and delete the unnamed ones and then 
several days later, here comes the warning.  I should not that the unnamed list 
seems to reappear each time I run the Wizard even though I deleted Unnamed 
formulas the day before.

  Any comments by anyone who has figured out a reasonably efficient way to 
handle this situation?

  Thanks,

  Ken
   


------------------------------------------------------------------------------


  No virus found in this incoming message.
  Checked by AVG Free Edition.
  Version: 7.5.432 / Virus Database: 268.17.28/672 - Release Date: 2/6/2007 
10:22 AM

Reply via email to