Not so sure. Bill can step in here and set the record straight. But presenting backtesting results as "Example Performance" will be hard to defend.
Also, linking to Marketocracy homepage instead of his listings seems questionable. I stick with my suggestion, just a suggestion to *consider* removal. -treliff --- In [email protected], "Paul Ho" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Before suggesting such a step to TJ > maybe you should write to Bill and give him the courtesy of a reply > > > _____ > > From: [email protected] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf > Of treliff > Sent: Thursday, 15 March 2007 2:36 PM > To: [email protected] > Subject: [amibroker] Re: Seward Trading > > > > If these indeed are (optimized) backtesting results then that's an > outrage. > > I just searched Marketocracy's top 100 over the last 5 years > and "seward" isn't there, despite his claim: > > "I've been a top-ranked trader (top 100 or better out of over 50,000 > traders) at Marketocracy eight times in the past several years." > > Perhaps TJ can consider removing that link, just a suggestion. > > -treliff > > --- In [EMAIL PROTECTED] <mailto:amibroker%40yahoogroups.com> ps.com, > "onelkm" <LKMCD1@> wrote: > > > > I asked Bill several months ago about his systems performance > results. > > As I recall, the stated performance is backtested, not from actual > > trading. I would be cautious, most "systems" look good when > backtested, > > but do not trade well going forward ..... > > Larry > > > > > > > > --- In [EMAIL PROTECTED] <mailto:amibroker%40yahoogroups.com> ps.com, > "davelansing2004" <d.ankrapp@> > > wrote: > > > > > > Has anybody purchased Bill Seward's course featured on the > Amibroker > > > website? My trading has been dismal for quite awhile and so I'm > > > willing to purchase a reputable methodology in order to get back > on > > > track, money-wise, while trying to get my confidence back. > > > > > > Thanks. > > > > > >
