Naw, stick with PDF! IMHO, HTML will take more effort and present an uneven experience, since it will depend on the version of the browser, the default size of the viewing font, etc. See what happens when you paste a table in an email client using HTML, like mine. Consistency in presenting text and images is why Adobe Acrobat is so popular.
Best regards Joe ----- Original Message ----- From: brian_z321 To: [email protected] Sent: Wednesday, April 11, 2007 5:36 AM Subject: [amibroker] Re:user group training project --- In [email protected], "Michael.S.G." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >Why do you recommend HTML? > I think it's much better to be presented with a proper web page that can > guide you along the way > rather than a simple server directory tree to choose your files. > Still use .PDF but just make links in the webpage to download them. You computer guys. If I hang around y'all much longer you will turn me into an alpha-tech as well. Now I'm thinking *webpages* ;-) I'll start with PDF but maybe put a skin on it if I keep going. My concern is that it can be self managing when I am not around any more. Another point is that I don't want to overmanage; rather leave it open so people can put stuff there in any format if they want to. Thanks for your feedback. Brian.
