Can we close off this eSignal pricing thread? These price increases by eSignal are nominal...IF you are a successful trader.
--- In [email protected], "Mark Jarvis" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Gee at those prices, DTN is still looking good. > > On 18 Apr 2007 09:06:47 -0700, Tomasz Janeczko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > Hello, > > > > 'eSignal Basic' is discountinued service. > > > > New "eSignal Data Access" service will start officially sometime in MAY. > > The pricing (unofficial) should look as follows: > > > > eSignal Data Access (For use with third party > > software only) > > Base Fee: $60 per month > > Service Options*: > > Stocks: $15/mo > > Futures: $25/mo > > Options: $50/mo > > Forex: $50/mo > > Market Depth: $20/mo > > * Exchange fees apply > > > > Best regards, > > Tomasz Janeczko > > amibroker.com > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > *From:* Dennis Brown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > *To:* [email protected] > > *Sent:* Wednesday, April 18, 2007 4:17 PM > > *Subject:* Re: [amibroker] eSignal Data new service > > > > Rakesh, > > First, I was already an eSignal monthly Basic Service customer. I was > > informed by email that my service was going away May 1st and that if I did > > nothing I would be upgraded to the more expensive service. I called > > customer service and told them I did not want the upgrade, I wanted to > > downgrade to the new Data Only service that was in a footnote to the email. > > I also told them I only use AB and not their charting. Customer service > > took care of the rest from there. Since they have not officially made the > > new program terms available yet, I don't know any other details. Perhaps I > > got a special introductory deal because I was a previous subscriber or > > because I was an AB user. I guess we will have to wait until it is > > officially unveiled to know all the details. Maybe they are still deciding > > the details. > > > > Dennis > > > > On Apr 18, 2007, at 10:00 AM, Rakesh Sahgal wrote: > > > > Dennis > > > > Could you please let me know what is the exact nomenclature the company is > > using for this pricing plan? I just spoke to a support rep at Esignal and > > the chap was absolutely clueless about this pricing plan. He insisted that > > the minimum the company charges is 77$/mo for data only services and if one > > includes the charting module it is 117$/mo. Their reps dont seem to know > > what the company is doing. > > > > Rakesh > > > > On 4/18/07, Dennis Brown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > Paul, > > > I was told that it was the same as Basic Service. I think it was 50 > > > symbols at a time. I never noticed any limitation with AB. > > > > > > Dennis > > > > > > On Apr 18, 2007, at 7:34 AM, Paul Ho wrote: > > > > > > How many symbols can you have concurrently, Dennis? > > > > > > > > > ------------------------------ > > > *From:* [email protected] [ mailto:[email protected]<[email protected]>] > > > *On Behalf Of *Dennis Brown > > > *Sent:* Wednesday, 18 April 2007 9:19 PM > > > *To:* [email protected] > > > *Subject:* [amibroker] eSignal Data new service > > > > > > I just got my notice of new service. > > > The monthly charge is $30 + $7 exchange fees. > > > I am a happy camper. > > > > > > Dennis > > > > > > On Apr 15, 2007, at 2:22 PM, Dennis Brown wrote: > > > > > > > Mike, > > > > > > > > I had to call customer service to get my account switched to the new > > > > service. It is not "officially available yet". I told them I did > > > > not want the automatic upgrade, but wanted the downgrade to data > > > > only. I was told my monthly charge would be $37. I was not > > > > expecting it to drop all the way in half, but I was very happy, and > > > > stopped looking into other providers at that point. Of course, > > > > thinking about it more, the customer service rep could have made a > > > > mistake and given me the price for the 2 weeks prorated to the end of > > > > this month instead of the monthly rate I asked for. I guess I will > > > > find out soon enough when the next bill arrives. > > > > > > > > Dennis > > > > > > > > On Apr 15, 2007, at 9:59 AM, chomper777 wrote: > > > > > > > >> Dennis, > > > >> > > > >> How much did you pay for "eSignal Data" and how did you sign up? I > > > >> can't find anything on it on eSignal website and when I talk to the > > > >> online sales people he didn't know anything about this new plan. > > > >> > > > >> thanks > > > >> mike > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> --- In [email protected] <amibroker% 40yahoogroups.com>, > > > "jydejyde" <cj@> wrote: > > > >>> > > > >>> Dennis, are do you know how their FOREX data are? I remember they > > > >>> were > > > >>> pretty atrocious when I used them a long time ago. > > > >>> > > > >>> CJ > > > >>> > > > >>> --- In [email protected] <amibroker% 40yahoogroups.com> , > > > Dennis Brown <see3d@> wrote: > > > >>>> > > > >>>> Hello, > > > >>>> > > > >>>> I just switched to the eSignal data only version. My price is half > > > >>>> of what I was paying for their basic service. The only > > > >>>> difference in > > > >>>> data is no Philadelphia index data. > > > >>>> > > > >>>> Dennis > > > >>>> > > > >>>> On Apr 11, 2007, at 5:51 PM, Tomasz Janeczko wrote: > > > >>>> > > > >>>>> There will be cheaper "data-only" feed from eSignal available > > > >>>>> within one month time. > > > >>>>> Also IQFeed is the cheaper alternative. > > > >>>>> > > > >>>>> Best regards, > > > >>>>> Tomasz Janeczko > > > >>>>> amibroker.com > > > >>>>> ----- Original Message ----- > > > >>>>> From: "murthysuresh" <money@> > > > >>>>> To: < [email protected] <amibroker% 40yahoogroups.com>> > > > >>>>> Sent: Tuesday, April 10, 2007 4:05 AM > > > >>>>> Subject: [amibroker] esignal vs equis > > > >>>>> > > > >>>>> > > > >>>>>> With Esignal raising thier rates and scrapping the basic version, > > > > > > >>>>>> I am > > > >>>>>> reviewing other vendors including Equis. I belive that we can get > > > >>>>>> equis > > > >>>>>> in metastock format with 500 symbols. Have any one used it with > > > >>>>>> amibroker. How good is it? > > > >>>>>> > > > >>>>>> Appreciate feedback. > > > >>>>>> > > > >>>>>> Seede > > > >>>>>> > > > >>>>>> > > > >>>>>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
