In my opinion afl and it's array processing language are really good and intuitive. For me, that I'm not a programmer, the only thing that afl is lacking is more built-in position management functions. If you compare Amibroker and Wealth-Lab, the two programs that i know best, Wealth-Lab has a lot of built-in position management functions which are a great help, at least for me that I'm not a experienced programmer. I hope that these built-in will be implemented as the development course of Amibroker .
--- In [email protected], "Ed Hoopes" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > What you need to do is to create in your mind a model of how .afl > works. This can be done by reading the documentation supplied with > the software, and watching the tutorials on the website. Once this is > done it will be easy to create code to do the things you want. > > You might think how do I know? I'm in my mid 60s and have > professionally (that is worked for W-2 income) programmed in: > > PDP-11 assembly language > Fortran > Cobol > Datatrieve > Forth (a TRULY nasty lang that uses Reverse Polish Notation) > DCL > JavaScript > C > > AFL is neither exceptionally better or worse than any of the above. > > It is a specialty language for processing data in arrays, then > plotting the results. It does a good job at what it was designed to do. > > Reef-Break > > > --- In [email protected], "Homar Simpson" <x77777x@> wrote: > > > > programming in Amibroker an unpleasant experiance every time I > > attempt to do the simplest thing. > > > > Power without ease of use is useless. > > >
