Herman thanks for your short resume of the Trading world. Just a simple 
question. Do you really believe that group number 1 exists ? So Traders that do 
generate with a minimum of code on a consistent basis a daily return of 2,5% 
without losing their pants on a terrible outlier or drawdown that will take 
them out of business ? My experience is that only a very small group of about 
5% of the '2,5%+ return Day Traders' is reaching for a relatively short period 
of time the above target ...

Regards, Ton.


  ----- Original Message ----- 
  From: Herman 
  To: Howard B 
  Cc: [email protected] 
  Sent: Sunday, May 27, 2007 2:08 AM
  Subject: Re: [amibroker] Re: Ideas for Swing Trading?



  Every few years this type of discussion surfaces and it is great fun to read  




  It always surprises me how two types of traders can be so oblivious to each 
others' way of thinking. Consider two types of traders (ignoring the many types 
in between):




  1) Those who scan 100+ stocks in Real-Time and trade small lots of 100 shares 
(or whatever the market allows) 5-100 times a day, easily making up to a few 
percent on good days, using an automated trading system. 

  2) Those who trade portfolios with 1000-10000 shares/trade and must roll over 
millions of dollars trading for others, making, if they are lucky a few 
percent/month.




  We have both of these traders on this list but really they should have their 
own lists, perhaps AmiBroker-Fat and AmiBroker-Skinny  their expectations are 
not and cannot be the same.




  In the first category volumes, market trends, market analysis, traditional 
TA, etc. play a minor role in system design. Their systems can be extremely 
simple and their trading rules may be expressed using only half a dozen lines 
of code while their automation code may easily exceed 1000 lines. Their trading 
screen may only display a lists of tickers with order status: no charts. They 
work hard to design and optimize code for maximum execution speed so that to 
can get their orders placed before the next quote comes in - speed translates 
in profits and 20-40 mSec execution is typical. 




  Almost everything for the second category is reversed: they thrive on 
traditional TA using many colorful chart-layouts, perhaps totalling 1000s of 
lines of code. Their automation code, if they  use it, may just be a a hundred 
lines long and aims to save them some typing - not to catch a trade. They use 
old (10-20 years!) techniques and statistical analysis that are rehashed over 
and over, they thrive on sophisticated analysis to squeeze out a fraction of a 
percent more per month (or reduce awful DDs). Code can be bloated with cosmetic 
stuff and its OK if it takes 5 minutes to execute. 




  Traders from both categories ought to respect each others.




  best regards,

  herman






















  Sunday, May 27, 2007, 5:27:22 AM, you wrote:




        >
       Hi Dennis --




        Averages 2.5% per day!?




        That same $1,000 starting account becomes $294,000,000 in two years.




        (1.025) ^ 510 = 294,558




        Please pass my email address on to your friend who gets 2.5% per day.  
howardbandy at gmail.com  I have contacts who will reward him handsomely.  




        When Larry Williams ran $10,000 to $1,000,000 in one year and became 
famous for it, that required a return of 1.84% per day.  2.5% per day turns 
$10,000 to $5,039,800 in one year.  




        Help me understand -- Assume I can average 1% per day on, say, 
$100,000.  Every month, I start with $100,000 and make $24,471 on that 
$100,000.  Why would I pull my $24,471 profits out so that they can make 1% for 
the next month instead of continuing to trade them and making 24% for the next 
month? 




        And, yes, trading in size affects the market.  But if your friend is 
trading several times per day in markets with high liquidity and narrow 
bid-asked spreads, then $1,000,000 is still small size.  QQQQ and IWM each 
regularly trade $5 billion dollars a day -- $1,000,000 is 5 seconds worth of 
trading. 




        Pardon my skepticism --  




        Thanks,

        Howard

        www.quantitativetradingsystems.com










        On 5/26/07, Dennis Brown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

              I know of more than one 1% per day method, but of course it will 
not work to compound.  That is not the way a true trader does it.  I know a 
trader who averages 2.5% per day on about 5 trades per day on one ETF, and 
holds no position overnight.  He pulls his profits out and lives on them or 
puts them to work in longer term investments.    High rates of return only work 
for small investments and usually require a lot of personal attention and 
pattern recognition during the day.  If it worked for large sums, or easy 
computer algorithms, the big boys (or hoards) would work that angle to death 
and the edge would get neutralized.  Once you try to increase position sizes 
above a certain amount, you start to influence the market and you have no one 
to play against --it takes two to have a market.  That is why large mutual 
funds must look to a fundamental value model.  They can not trade the 
technicals quick enough without killing the market.  A true trader will just 
work the market technicals to pull out a small amount of money at a consistent 
rate (no home runs).  Over time, the results add up to a decent living. 




              Dennis










              On May 26, 2007, at 4:02 PM, Howard B wrote:







              One percent a day.  Yeah, right. 




              Compound one percent a day for five years and a $1,000 trading 
account becomes $278,000,000.  Start with real money and own Manhattan.




              (1.01) ^ 1260 = 278,567




              Howard







              On 5/26/07, dralexchambers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: 

              T-ohrt - the thing you are missing is not your technical ability, 
but 

              your BELIEF and your ATTITUDE to new things.




              You seem to mistrust my recommendation when in fact you nothing 
of 

              me, my level of trading knowledge, this system or my involvement 
with 

              it (my involvement is none other than my affiliate link - just to 

              make that entirely clear).




              If you believe that 1% a month is all that is possible, that will 
be

              your reality, and you will discount ideas that make more as 
trickery. 




              If you want trade lists, further explanations on the system I

              recommended - discuss it with David, the author. It is not my job 
to

              divulge a system that someone else owns.




              However, I will say that David's system is very credible and also 

              very simple. I have recieved a lot of support from David and his 

              system opened my eyes to swing trading.




              I also know of an individual who makes 1% A DAY - and publishes 
all 

              his methods and indicators for free, online. 




              Look for The Rumpled One at:




              www.kreslik.com.




              I am currently porting his work over to Amibroker on that site. 




              And yes, once again - it is all FREE, and you definately won't 
find

              it in your "Beyond Technical Analysis" book. 




              AC



             





       


   

Reply via email to