HI Howard.  

I didn't buy the book.  However, Torbjörn Ohrt did and was able to code some 
AFL from it.  His preliminary results on one stock seemed very promising, which 
was what perked our interests.  Check out his post from May 28.

chuck


  ----- Original Message ----- 
  From: Howard B 
  To: [email protected] 
  Sent: Monday, May 28, 2007 2:36 PM
  Subject: Re: [amibroker] Re: Ideas for Swing Trading?


  Hi Chuck --

  I have visited the web site and have seen the ad for the $97 book, Short Term 
Swing Trading by David Graeme-Smith.  Here is the link:
  http://www.shortswingtrading.com/?hop=netdoc 

  Does the book describe the system in sufficient detail that the AmiBroker 
code can be written?

  There is a discussion of the book at this site:
  http://www.trade2win.com/boards/showthread.php?t=10750

  One of the postings is:
  -------------------------------
  It uses a popular technical indicator, confirmed by price action, to signal 
trades (using EOD charts). When the price is above a widely followed daily 
moving average only long trades are taken, and vice versa for short trades. 
Exits are determined by trailing stops. Key to the workings of the system is 
the selection of tradeables with the right "personality" - i.e. those 
exhibiting smooth trends. The package includes watchlists of UK & US stocks 
which fall into this category.

  Experienced traders, familiar with TA, will gain little or nothing from this 
e-book. It would be most useful to those with little or no experience, as it is 
commendably easy & simple to understand & follow, with a reasonable money 
management strategy, and it`s cheap! So far I`ve only backtested it visually on 
past charts, but it appears to be a sound method for EOD swing trading.
  ------------------------------

  Does your reading of the book agree with the poster?

  If that is true, then AmiBroker code that is already available in the 
AmiBroker Library and among the AmiBroker User Functions would be sufficient to 
create a similar system, and mentioning which of those are good candidates for 
further exploration would not be a violation of copyright. 


  Thanks,
  Howard


  On 5/28/07, cstrader <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

    Howard.

    The problem is that the source of the code is a $97 book.  I'm no lawyer, 
but I don't see why sharing ideas (in your own words), or even code that you 
have written, for free, based on a book that you purchased would be be 
protected in any way.  But then I also know that copyright laws are changing 
every day.

    chuck




      
      ----- Original Message ----- 
      From: Howard B 
      To: [email protected] 
      Sent: Monday, May 28, 2007 12:52 PM 
      Subject: Re: [amibroker] Re: Ideas for Swing Trading?


      Greetings all --

      The results that have been posted will generate a lot of interest.  
Certainly the backtest results do not violate any copyright.  But the etiquette 
of these lists considers backtest results without code, or at least a detailed 
description of the technique, as spam.  

      Would someone please post a link to the document that is being used as 
the source for the code?  Those interested can obtain their own copy, join the 
appropriate discussion groups, and be free from any copyright restrictions. 

      Thanks,
      Howard


      On 5/28/07, t_ohrt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: 
        Dave, 

        I don´t think copyright is violated by sharing backtest results with 
        AB users? I have no intention to reveal any of my coding without 
        permission from the author of the system. I won´t even discuss the 
        nature of the system at all, sorry. But as you open my eyes to 
        potential legal problems I will contact the author before sharing 
        more results. Perhaps it´s better to follow your advise.

        My involvement in this discussion originated from the suggestion from 
        Dr Alex Chambers, on this forum to visit the SST site. He suggested a 
        monthly return from the system, which exceeded my horizon. My 
        backtesting so far is incomplete, as I have not used the position 
        sizing suggested by the author, having still to read up on how this 
        is coded in AFL.

        Ton, you have to wait a bit for the results...

        T.O.

        --- In [email protected], "David Smith" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 


        wrote:
        >
        > Torbjoern (& others), it sounds like a few of us have looked into 
        that
        > method. Due to the copyright, perhaps we could discuss the afl 
        coding on
        > the SST forum which is for members only? I have tried coding as 
        well, but
        > there is still a lot of discretion in deciding on stocks lists 
        etc. I would
        > like to see a more definitive method before I would even consider 
        trading &
        > would be up for a discussion on the other forum.
        > 
        > Anyone interested?
        > 
        > Dave
        > 
        > 
        > -----Original Message-----
        > From: [email protected] [mailto: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
        On Behalf
        > Of Torbjörn Ohrt
        > Sent: Monday, 28 May 2007 7:46 PM
        > To: [email protected]
        > Subject: [amibroker] Re: Ideas for Swing Trading?
        > 
        > 
        > 
        > 
        > Ton,
        > 
        > Attached is test result for SST. Trades are without position 
        sizing, total
        > equity is invested for every trade. 100000 SEK starting equity, 
        commission
        > 99 SEK/Trade. The author recommends to risk maximum 5% of equity, 
        initial
        > stop loss is fixed. He recommends trading only low volatility 
        stocks. If you
        > send me a not too long list of Belgian ticker symbols (Yahoo EOD) 
        perhaps I
        > can do a backtest....
        > T.O.
        > 8
        >







   

Reply via email to