This was presented at Huston Conference and is referenced in help files. 

http://www.amibroker.com/docs/Houston2.pdf


----- Original Message ----- 
From: "cherokee32819" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[email protected]>
Sent: Tuesday, September 11, 2007 3:29 PM
Subject: [amibroker] Re: CBI - Some question from TJ's PDF document


> What PDF document are you talking about?  I can not find this one.
> 
> 
> 
> 
> --- In [email protected], "Ara Kaloustian" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>> 1. page 6 shows a table of the raw signals, phase 1 Potential Trade 
> signals (where duplicate signals are eliminated, and phase 2 actual 
> trade signals after evaluating position score.
>> 
>> Page 10 shows phase 1 as part of regular trading system.
>> 
>> Issue #1:
>> Buy array from regular trading system contains multiple (raw) 
> signals.
>> Where exactly is phase 1, where we can see the signals for 
> potential trades without reduntant signals.
>> 
>> Issue #2:
>> 
>> Page 10 shows trading system code (labeled phase 1) placed AFTER 
> CBI code.
>> 
>> When I follow this, I get no results.
>> 
>> If I place my code before CBI code, I do get trades shown properly.
>> 
>> 
>> Thanks
>> 
>> ara
>>
> 
> 
> 
> 
> Please note that this group is for discussion between users only.
> 
> To get support from AmiBroker please send an e-mail directly to 
> SUPPORT {at} amibroker.com
> 
> For NEW RELEASE ANNOUNCEMENTS and other news always check DEVLOG:
> http://www.amibroker.com/devlog/
> 
> For other support material please check also:
> http://www.amibroker.com/support.html
> 
> Yahoo! Groups Links
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
>

Reply via email to