Just as it explains in the help file for Equity function, but in a nutshell for common usage:
Equity(0) is for single symbol backtest capital values Equity(1,-1) -default if written as Equity(1) - is for removing surplus signals, and trade arrows only show after analysis is run, for that analysis range. Arrows show on trade signal bar. Equity(1,0) also removes surplus signals but shows the trade arrows on chart on the bar the signal occurs. Equity(2) the trade arrows on charts show on the actual bar of entry/exit. Advised in help that not normally used. See help for additional RangeType inputs in the brackets. -- Cheers Graham Kav AFL Writing Service http://www.aflwriting.com On 05/11/2007, balin8425 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I think that the way Equity(1) fails to signal on the current bar is > a bug. > > > --- In [email protected], "balin8425" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > I have been trying to get a handle on this for quite a while. > > Depending on which one I use I get different results in my > backtests, > > scans and explorations. Portfolio trading. > > > > Equity(0) gives me a correct backtest, but my explorations (for > > trading signals with PositionScore) don't filter out the redundant > > signals. > > > > Equity(1) in explorations filters out the redundant signals but > never > > shows a signal for the final day - useless for trading. > > > > Equity(2) ? I'm not sure what is happening. Needs more study. > > > > ExRem changes the backtest slightly on some days and I haven't > > figured out why it rejects certain signals which had higher > position > > scores. > > > > I would like my backtests to match my explorations for signals. > I'm > > using a 1 delay for buys, which I know is a problem for Equity(1). > > I've read the manual multiple times and searched the list. Is > there > > a best way to approach this? > > > > I've use status action in order to use different of the above > > functions in the backtester and the exploration but it seems overly > > complex. As does using ref(buy,-1) to deal with delays, which > seems > > also kludgy to me. > > > > thanks for any clarification > > Balin > > > > > > > Please note that this group is for discussion between users only. > > To get support from AmiBroker please send an e-mail directly to > SUPPORT {at} amibroker.com > > For NEW RELEASE ANNOUNCEMENTS and other news always check DEVLOG: > http://www.amibroker.com/devlog/ > > For other support material please check also: > http://www.amibroker.com/support.html > > Yahoo! Groups Links > > > >
