HB,

To smooth out the risk, I would like to try to properly position size as
well as normalize the risk per trade based on the "Average Standard
Deviation of Daily Percent Returns",
and do some back testing and see what happens on lesser than daily time
frames as well...

I would like to use it on a 1Min base database, but have it be time
"Interval() Independent", so,
as I select a view of a different time frame, it numerically remains
proportionally constant per viewing interval().
So, I started with a 1 Min database and ...

TimeFrameSet( inDaily ); // switch to Daily timeframe
/* Daily Percent Returns from 1Min Bars */
DailyPercentReturn = abs((Close - Ref(C,-1)) / Close);
TimeFrameRestore(); // restore time frame to original
TimeFrameSet( inDaily ); // switch now to Daily
//AvgDailyPercentReturn = MA(StDev(abs(MA( DailyPercentReturn ,
15 )),15),15);
AvgDailyPercentReturn = StDev(abs(MA( DailyPercentReturn , 20)),20);
TimeFrameRestore(); // restore time frame to original
TimeFrameSet( inDaily ); // switch to Daily frame
/* ATR Daily Bars */
DailyATR15 = ATR(15); // 1N Risk in Daily Frame
TimeFrameRestore(); // restore time frame to original
//Plot( Close, "Price", colorWhite, styleCandle | styleOwnScale);
Plot(Close,"Close",128,1);
//Plot( TimeFrameExpand( DailyPercentReturn , inDaily ), "Daily Pecent
Returns", colorBlue );
//Plot( TimeFrameExpand( AvgDailyPercentReturn *Close , inDaily ), "Risk
Normalized Daily ", colorWhite );
//Plot( TimeFrameExpand( DailyATR15 , inDaily ), "DailyATR15 ", colorWhite);
Plot( TimeFrameExpand( Close + (AvgDailyPercentReturn *Close) , inDaily ),
"\nClose + Risk Normalized Daily ", colorGreen );
Plot( TimeFrameExpand( ((Close + (AvgDailyPercentReturn *Close) + Close -
(AvgDailyPercentReturn *Close))/2) , inDaily ), "\nRisk Normalized Avg Daily
Percent Returns Average ", colorWhite );
Plot( TimeFrameExpand( Close - (AvgDailyPercentReturn *Close) , inDaily ),
"\nClose - Risk Normalized Daily ", colorRed );
////////////////
Thanks
MV
  -----Original Message-----
  From: [email protected] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Behalf Of Howard B
  Sent: Tuesday, December 04, 2007 8:08 PM
  To: [email protected]
  Subject: Re: [amibroker] PlottingFunctions() arrrrgh...


  Hi Mr. Valley --

  I recognize this as Figure 22.5 in Quantitative Trading Systems. It
  is not intended to be plotted. It is intended to define the
  cumulative distribution function that will later be used to generate
  pseudo-random variables.

  What is it you want to accomplish?

  Thanks,
  Howard

  On 12/3/07, Mr. Valley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
  > Hopefully gracious soul can help me.
  > I am having a very difficult time trying to plot something so easy as a
c
  > style function I think and I just don't "get it".
  > Sometimes I can get it to work and others not.
  >
  > What is the logic behind plotting a "function" used this way.
  >
  > Just thinking of plotting a distribution of the Close or even a random
  > number just to get it working...
  > ...the [index] brackets are throwing me off... with a syntax error...
  >
  > Thanks in advance...
  >
  > Mr Valley
  >
  >
////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
  > ///////////
  >
  > // InitializeNormalCDF.afl
  > //
  > function InitializeNormalCDF()
  >
  > // array for the Normalized Cum Dist function.
  > {
  > NormCDF[0] = -3.090;
  > NormCDF[1] = -2.326;
  > NormCDF[2] = -2.053;
  > NormCDF[3] = -1.881;
  > NormCDF[4] = -1.751;
  > NormCDF[5] = -1.645;
  > NormCDF[6] = -1.555;
  > NormCDF[7] = -1.476;
  > NormCDF[8] = -1.405;
  > NormCDF[9] = -1.341;
  > NormCDF[10] = -1.282;
  > NormCDF[11] = -1.227;
  > NormCDF[12] = -1.175;
  > NormCDF[13] = -1.126;
  > NormCDF[14] = -1.080;
  > NormCDF[15] = -1.036;
  > NormCDF[16] = -0.994;
  > NormCDF[17] = -0.954;
  > NormCDF[18] = -0.915;
  > NormCDF[19] = -0.878;
  > NormCDF[20] = -0.842;
  > NormCDF[21] = -0.806;
  > NormCDF[22] = -0.772;
  > NormCDF[23] = -0.739;
  > NormCDF[24] = -0.706;
  > NormCDF[25] = -0.674;
  > NormCDF[26] = -0.643;
  > NormCDF[27] = -0.613;
  > NormCDF[28] = -0.583;
  > NormCDF[29] = -0.553;
  > NormCDF[30] = -0.524;
  > NormCDF[31] = -0.496;
  > NormCDF[32] = -0.468;
  > NormCDF[33] = -0.440;
  > NormCDF[34] = -0.412;
  > NormCDF[35] = -0.385;
  > NormCDF[36] = -0.358;
  > NormCDF[37] = -0.332;
  > NormCDF[38] = -0.305;
  > NormCDF[39] = -0.279;
  > NormCDF[40] = -0.253;
  > NormCDF[41] = -0.228;
  > NormCDF[42] = -0.202;
  > NormCDF[43] = -0.176;
  > NormCDF[44] = -0.151;
  > NormCDF[45] = -0.126;
  > NormCDF[46] = -0.100;
  > NormCDF[47] = -0.075;
  > NormCDF[48] = -0.050;
  > NormCDF[49] = -0.025;
  > NormCDF[50] = 0.000;
  > NormCDF[51] = 0.025;
  > NormCDF[52] = 0.050;
  > NormCDF[53] = 0.075;
  > NormCDF[54] = 0.100;
  > NormCDF[55] = 0.126;
  > NormCDF[56] = 0.151;
  > NormCDF[57] = 0.176;
  > NormCDF[58] = 0.202;
  > NormCDF[59] = 0.228;
  > NormCDF[60] = 0.253;
  > NormCDF[61] = 0.279;
  > NormCDF[62] = 0.305;
  > NormCDF[63] = 0.332;
  > NormCDF[64] = 0.358;
  > NormCDF[65] = 0.385;
  > NormCDF[66] = 0.412;
  > NormCDF[67] = 0.440;
  > NormCDF[68] = 0.468;
  > NormCDF[69] = 0.496;
  > NormCDF[70] = 0.524;
  > NormCDF[71] = 0.553;
  > NormCDF[72] = 0.583;
  > NormCDF[73] = 0.613;
  > NormCDF[74] = 0.643;
  > NormCDF[75] = 0.674;
  > NormCDF[76] = 0.706;
  > NormCDF[77] = 0.739;
  > NormCDF[78] = 0.772;
  > NormCDF[79] = 0.806;
  > NormCDF[80] = 0.842;
  > NormCDF[81] = 0.878;
  > NormCDF[82] = 0.915;
  > NormCDF[83] = 0.954;
  > NormCDF[84] = 0.994;
  > NormCDF[85] = 1.036;
  > NormCDF[86] = 1.080;
  > NormCDF[87] = 1.126;
  > NormCDF[88] = 1.175;
  > NormCDF[89] = 1.227;
  > NormCDF[90] = 1.281;
  > NormCDF[91] = 1.341;
  > NormCDF[92] = 1.405;
  > NormCDF[93] = 1.476;
  > NormCDF[94] = 1.555;
  > NormCDF[95] = 1.645;
  > NormCDF[96] = 1.751;
  > NormCDF[97] = 1.881;
  > NormCDF[98] = 2.054;
  > NormCDF[99] = 2.326;
  > NormCDF[100] = 3.090;
  > return(Null);
  > }
  >
  >
  > // plot goes here ... I think
  >
  >
  >
  > // NormalRandomizedNumber.afl
  > //
  > function NormalRandomNumber()
  > {
  > Index = int(100* rand()) + 1;
  > return(NormCDF[index]);
  > }
  >
  > // plot goes here ... I think
  >


  

Reply via email to