Hello, Unless you use a _lot_ of looping, compiling will give you no improvement at all. AFL ARRAY code runs at full native CPU speed.
Best regards, Tomasz Janeczko amibroker.com ----- Original Message ----- From: Ara Kaloustian To: [email protected] Sent: Monday, December 10, 2007 1:37 AM Subject: Re: [amibroker] Is native AFL or AFL converted to a Plugin faster? yes. The compiling process can give you a 10x speed advantage (if done well). ----- Original Message ----- From: Padhu To: [email protected] Sent: Sunday, December 09, 2007 4:29 PM Subject: Re: [amibroker] Is native AFL or AFL converted to a Plugin faster? Hi Ara, correction - 6000 lines. So would a plugin be faster ?. Thanks,Padhu ----- Original Message ----- From: Ara Kaloustian To: [email protected] Sent: Sunday, December 09, 2007 5:27 PM Subject: Re: [amibroker] Is native AFL or AFL converted to a Plugin faster? To improve speed you need to compile the code. I assume that's what you mean by converting it to plug-in. Putting it into an include file will make no difference. ----- Original Message ----- From: Padhu To: [email protected] Sent: Sunday, December 09, 2007 8:37 AM Subject: [amibroker] Is native AFL or AFL converted to a Plugin faster? My code is too long for my taste( little over 600 lines)...Lot of it is just assignment of entry,stop,exit variables. I'd like to ask for suggestions.. 1. Does it make any difference if I remove chunk of the code and make it part of an include file ?. 2. Does iy make any difference if I have the AFL code converted into an AFL plugin(similar to the chandlier plugin)?. Does this improve speed?. 3. What else can be done to manage legnthy codebase better?. I have already eliminated various repetitions in my code. Thanks,Padhu
