Your right that in most cases there is not a big difference but if you switch between the 2 you can see the indicators shift.
--- In [email protected], "wavemechanic" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > It probably does not make a significant difference but the original formulation of CCI used AVG rather than (H + L) / 2 > > Bill > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "bilbo0211" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: <[email protected]> > Sent: Tuesday, January 01, 2008 7:16 PM > Subject: [amibroker] Re: Is there a way to get CCI to accept an array for periods? > > > > I also don't see any point to include the C of a bar for intraday > > charts. I use CCIa((H+L)/2,period). > > > > Bill > > > > > > > > Please note that this group is for discussion between users only. > > > > To get support from AmiBroker please send an e-mail directly to > > SUPPORT {at} amibroker.com > > > > For NEW RELEASE ANNOUNCEMENTS and other news always check DEVLOG: > > http://www.amibroker.com/devlog/ > > > > For other support material please check also: > > http://www.amibroker.com/support.html > > > > Yahoo! Groups Links > > > > > > >
