You're correct, of course, in that it doesn't generate an interrupt. But
having programmed polling routines 40+ years ago and interrupt driven
routines as well it can be done with both although, as you say, with a LOT
less trouble via interrupts.

d

> -----Original Message-----
> From: [email protected] 
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of scourt2000
> Sent: Tuesday, January 29, 2008 8:51 PM
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: [amibroker] Re: Trading platform + AB
> 
> 
> "This can be done now using GetCursorMouseButtons(), 
> GetCursorXPosition() and GetCursorYPosition() . HOWEVER there is no 
> function that returns the ChartID for the chartpane over which the 
> mouse is clicked"
> 
> Hi Herman,
> 
> All of that chartID stuff would not be necessary if you tied the 
> mouse button clicks to well-known event routines (like that ones I 
> mentioned as an example) which get called specifically from the AFL 
> code behind a chart pane.
> 
> You want this type of facility event-driven, not polled.  Polling 
> puts more work on the user's side and brings up other unpleasant side-
> effects like what you just described.  
> 
> Which would you rather do?  
> 
> 1) Code a rats nest of polling inline with your other AFL code
> 
> -or-
> 
> 2) Have a well-known function called on a mouse click with all of the 
> information you need provided as the function parameters directed to 
> the script already bound to a particular chart pane?
> 
> Anyone who chooses #1 last seriously programmed a computer more than 
> 20 years ago.
> 
> "That's available now - check the list of functions, duude."
> 
> No it's not...duude [sic]
> 
> 
> 
> Please note that this group is for discussion between users only.
> 
> To get support from AmiBroker please send an e-mail directly to 
> SUPPORT {at} amibroker.com
> 
> For NEW RELEASE ANNOUNCEMENTS and other news always check DEVLOG:
> http://www.amibroker.com/devlog/
> 
> For other support material please check also:
> http://www.amibroker.com/support.html
>  
> Yahoo! Groups Links
> 
> 
> 

Reply via email to