No I didn't know that. That's why I leave all of the hard work to you ;-)
brian_z --- In [email protected], "Tomasz Janeczko" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Brian, > > As you know well, I am all for openess, and in a perfect world I would > say "edit whatever you wish (also other people material) anytime and anywhere". > > But unfortunatelly we are not living in a perfect world and allowing editing by anyone > would destroy the quality of UKB. > Wikipedia, as you know has FULL-TIME editors/admins > who don't do anything but watch for the changes and revert cases of vandalism, > the have dozens of programs that watch pages etc > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Counter-Vandalism_Unit > > You would be surprised how much work I have with moderation of comments > (literally hundreds of spammers every day attempting to UKB spam via comments) > > If editing was open to everyone without any control the UKB would be flooded > with spam/porn links/advertising within seconds. > > So current scheme of one-time simple registration and editing posts by author only is actually good balance > between maximum openess and maintenance costs. > > Best regards, > Tomasz Janeczko > amibroker.com > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "brian_z111" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: <[email protected]> > Sent: Monday, February 11, 2008 12:09 AM > Subject: [amibroker] Re: Slide show of stock charts > > > > Als0 - the reason I have supported Tomasz and AmiBroker is because he > > is talented, creative and hardworking (haveing a go) and likewise to > > a lot of the people he has attracted around him (who are there for > > the same reason as me). > > > > I hope that isn't too schmaltzy for you all. > > > > F.T.R > > > > I think what is most likely to slow me down at the UKB (and bring me > > to a halt) is that I am starting to build up a volume of work and > > eventually it has to be maintained - links break, stuff gets out of > > date - people report the errors (as they should). > > > > The task of maintaining what I have writen is going to become a > > burden. > > > > FTR - I personally didn't want the structure we have. > > > > I wanted "open authorship" so that other AB users could edit my work > > (correct mistakes, add updates, add extensions, rewrite it if it > > wasn't clear etc). That way the site would have remained self > > managing and always have dynamic content. > > > > I was also interested in participating in joint development where I > > might put up one of my half-finished projects that needs code input > > and the codesters could continue it to where ever (sometimes I do > > come up with one or two good ideas that people would like). > > > > Brian_z > > > > > > --- In [email protected], "Tomasz Janeczko" <groups@> > > wrote: > >> > >> Hello, > >> > >> I respectfully disagree. "Distributed content" is just nice name > > for a mess. > >> > >> Imagine that wikipedia authors posted only links to their own sites > >> instead of publishing directly on wikipedia site. The value of > > wikipedia > >> is because it contains actual content in ONE place instead of just > > links. > >> > >> Therefore it is stronly encouraged to post actual CONTENT, not the > > links > >> to your own site. Excessive linking to your own site may be > > considered as > >> free advertising and this list is not a place to get free > > advertising. > >> > >> Best regards, > >> Tomasz Janeczko > >> amibroker.com > >> ----- Original Message ----- > >> From: "progster01" <progster@> > >> To: <[email protected]> > >> Sent: Sunday, February 10, 2008 4:46 PM > >> Subject: [amibroker] Re: Slide show of stock charts > >> > >> > >> > --- In [email protected], "brian_z111" <brian_z111@> > > wrote: > >> > > >> >> if a lot of people had their own pages (commercial or not) > >> >> it would add up to an awesome reference manual even though we do > >> >> lose 'search from one desk'. > >> >> > >> >> Anyway the time has come to add a page for our Amifriends links. > >> > > >> > I agree with the above. Thanks, Brian, for your continuing > >> > positively-oriented comments and efforts. > >> > > >> > I'm a believer in distributed content, and I think the most > > effective > >> > "learning webs" going forward are going to be those which > > recognize > >> > the advantages and reality of author choice in "point of > > publishing". > >> > > >> > The URL is the great tie that binds! :^) > >> > > >> > Regardless of the origin of the initial impulse to write, when I > > post > >> > something substantive which I think may have reference value, I > >> > generally choose to make the best presentation I can, using the > > best > >> > (and most well-known) tools available to me, and then to publish > > it > >> > once in one place, with links elsewhere as seems helpful and > > appropriate. > >> > > >> > For anyone who wants to read in more detail about why I publish > > the > >> > way I do, I've written some about it in a post entitled 'Content > > Here, > >> > Links Elsewhere - Reasons Part 1', which can be found here: > >> > > >> > http://tinyurl.com/3a8s6k > >> > > >> > Otherwise, onwards! I don't propose to discuss this further here > > on > >> > the AB Yahoo list, because I think it is tangential to the > > questions, > >> > answers, and AB-related discussions that takes place here. > >> > > >> > I value everyone's contributions to these AB discussions, in > > whatever > >> > format works for them, wherever published and however linked to. > >> > > >> > Thanks to you all! > >> > > >> > P.S. I'd also suggest if ever it seems like a link I've provided > > is > >> > down that a) it's probably just a temporary issue, and b) email > >> > directly to me about it would make less clutter for this list. > > Cheers! > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > Please note that this group is for discussion between users only. > >> > > >> > To get support from AmiBroker please send an e-mail directly to > >> > SUPPORT {at} amibroker.com > >> > > >> > For NEW RELEASE ANNOUNCEMENTS and other news always check DEVLOG: > >> > http://www.amibroker.com/devlog/ > >> > > >> > For other support material please check also: > >> > http://www.amibroker.com/support.html > >> > > >> > Yahoo! Groups Links > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > > > > > > > > > Please note that this group is for discussion between users only. > > > > To get support from AmiBroker please send an e-mail directly to > > SUPPORT {at} amibroker.com > > > > For NEW RELEASE ANNOUNCEMENTS and other news always check DEVLOG: > > http://www.amibroker.com/devlog/ > > > > For other support material please check also: > > http://www.amibroker.com/support.html > > > > Yahoo! Groups Links > > > > > > >
