Ara,
Hi. It's been a long time. I remember that I did not like the industry/sector info from TC2000. I can remap the data if necessary. How do others handle this? Thanks, Dan. _____ From: [email protected] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ara Kaloustian Sent: Thursday, February 14, 2008 9:07 PM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: [amibroker] New EOD data feed other than Quotes Plus TC2000 is reliable, but they do not have fundamentals or very few. (at least that's what I remember from a while back). They do not have commodities and charge extra for mutual funds. Their data is ready earlier than QP. Their industry / sector structure is completely different tha QP. ----- Original Message ----- From: Dan Clark <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [email protected] Sent: Thursday, February 14, 2008 8:55 PM Subject: [amibroker] New EOD data feed other than Quotes Plus I've been using Quotes Plus data for the last 2-1/2 years. Overall, I've been very happy with Quotes Plus data and Gary Lyben's (owner/president) responsiveness. That said. In the last few days, I've swapped several e-mails about a minor billing issue (credit card renewed with different number) with a woman in his billing department. What should have been a very minor clerical issue left me feeling EXTREMELY angry and offended. I vowed to switch my data feed from Quotes Plus to another data feed as soon as possible. This is a major issue for me because of the amount of AFL recoding involved, but I can no longer do business with Quotes Plus. I need some options for other EOD data feeds. What EOD service are you using? What has your experience been? What are the alternatives now? Thanks and regards, Dan.
