What about the following ? Just to show you the difference ...

Plot(ATR(15)/Ref(C,-1)*100,"",colorRed,styleLine); 
Plot(StDev(C,15)/Ref(C,-1)*100,"",colorBlue,styleLine); 

Regards, Ton.

  ----- Original Message ----- 
  From: brian_z111 
  To: [email protected] 
  Sent: Tuesday, February 26, 2008 1:57 PM
  Subject: [amibroker] Re: Absolute value ATR?


  Louis,

  > Thanks for the suggestion. I must do something wrong however 
  >because from
  > the code I wrote
  > I get only results of ATR > 3-4. Only Indu.x is under 2; all the 
  >other one
  > are over 3-4, and sometimes 6-7 and more.

  I tried your code and didn't see any problems.
  For the Dow constituents most are around 1.25 - 2% for ATR(15) in the 
  period I looked at.

  Are you sure you didn't have Weekly selected instead of Daily?

  brian_z

  --- In [email protected], "Louis Préfontaine" 
  <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
  >
  > Hi,
  > 
  > Thanks for the suggestion. I must do something wrong however 
  because from
  > the code I wrote
  > 
  > _SECTION_BEGIN("ATR");
  > periods = Param( "Periods", 15, 1, 200, 1 );
  > Plot( ATR(periods)/Ref(C,-1)*100
  > , _DEFAULT_NAME(), ParamColor( "Color", colorCycle ), ParamStyle
  ("Style") );
  > 
  > LongPer = Param("Long Period", 50, 10, 100, 5 ); /* select periods 
  with
  > parameter window */
  > 
  > MidPer = Param("Mid Period", 20, 0, 50, 1);
  > ShortPer = Param("Short Period", 10, 3, 10, 1 );
  > 
  > LongEMA = EMA( ATR(periods)/Ref(C,-1)*100, LongPer );
  > MidEMA = EMA (ATR(periods)/Ref(C,-1)*100, MidPer);
  > ShortEMA = EMA( ATR(periods)/Ref(C,-1)*100, ShortPer );
  > 
  > _SECTION_END();
  > 
  > _SECTION_BEGIN("ema-ATR");
  > Plot( LongEMA, "EMA(ATR(periods)/Ref(C,-1)*100, "+WriteVal
  (LongPer,1)+")",
  > colorBlue,
  > styleLine|styleNoRescale );
  > Plot( MidEMA, " EMA(ATR(periods)/Ref(C,-1)*100, "+WriteVal(MidPer,1)
  +")",
  > colorBrown,
  > styleLine|styleNoRescale );
  > Plot( ShortEMA, " EMA(ATR(periods)/Ref(C,-1)*100,
  > "+WriteVal(ShortPer,1)+")", colorGreen,
  > styleLine|styleNoRescale );
  > 
  > 
  > _SECTION_END();
  > 
  > I get only results of ATR > 3-4. Only Indu.x is under 2; all the 
  other one
  > are over 3-4, and sometimes 6-7 and more.
  > 
  > However, are you sure about the idea of entering/exiting a stock 
  when
  > volatility gets too high? Wouldn't it be better simply to scan and 
  avoid
  > high volatily stocks to reduce the drawdown possibility?
  > 
  > Thanks,
  > 
  > Louis
  > 
  > 2008/2/24, brian_z111 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
  > >
  > > If you want a relative measure of range then you could use 
  ATR%, as
  > > suggested by Graham.
  > >
  > > High volatility stocks would be filtered by e.g. ATR% > 2 etc.
  > >
  > > In that case your stops would be something like:
  > >
  > > ProfitStop = Ref(C,-1) * (1 + ATR%/100);
  > > StopLoss = Ref(C,-1) * (1 - ATR%/100);
  > >
  > > If you want to standardise range then you could use:
  > >
  > > StandardATR = StDev(ATR(1),Periods);
  > >
  > > An example of a stop would then be:
  > >
  > > ProfitStop = Ref(C,-1) + StDev(ATR(1),20);
  > >
  > > Or maybe (for live work):
  > >
  > > ProfitStop = Ref(C,-1) + Ref(StDev(ATR(1),20),-1);
  > >
  > > Or something like that.
  > >
  > > That is only one way of doing it.
  > >
  > > You can try whatever you like, within the boundaries of your
  > > knowledge (plus a little bit more).
  > >
  > > brian_z *;-)
  > >
  > >
  > > --- In [email protected] <amibroker%40yahoogroups.com>,
  > > "brian_z111" <brian_z111@> wrote:
  > > >
  > > > Louis,
  > > >
  > > > > only thing I need to know is simply to set the STdev at 2 or 3
  > > (if
  > > > it's what
  > > > > I want to do) and then automatically ATR will be use that new
  > > StDev?
  > > > >
  > > >
  > > > No.
  > > >
  > > > ATR and StDev are both measures of volatility but they measure 
  it
  > > in
  > > > different ways. Generally you would use one or the other.
  > > >
  > > > StDev has special uses.
  > > >
  > > > If you want to use them it would pay off to study them closely
  > > first.
  > > >
  > > >
  > > > > I like your idea to make two groups; one with high volatility 
  and
  > > > one with
  > > > > low volatility. Would you consider it would be possible to
  > > adjust
  > > > the
  > > > > stop-loss differently for each group?
  > > >
  > > > You could try it e.g. the stop loss can be the close - StDev
  (C,20).
  > > > You can vary the stop loss for one group by using a multiplier 
  so
  > > the
  > > > stop loss could be close - StDev(C,20) * 1.5 for one group and
  > > close -
  > > > StDev(C,20) for the other.
  > > >
  > > >
  > > >
  > > > > And how do you filter the top
  > > > > performers?
  > > >
  > > > It depends on what you have chosen as your favourite metric for
  > > > evaluating systems. As I said in an earlier post I like Power
  > > Factor
  > > > (I will be explaining this at the UKB soon) but you would be 
  better
  > > > served choosing your own.
  > > >
  > > > If you are not sure on evaluation, and use of the metrics, then
  > > > Howard Bandy's book is a good place to start.
  > > >
  > > > Sorry, I can't help you any further with this.
  > > > I have a couple of posts for the UKB I want to get finished.
  > > >
  > > > BTW did you see the answer I gave you yesterday on "Trying to
  > > compare
  > > > market and industry" ?. see message # 120270
  > > >
  > > > I hopoe that helps you a little and good luck with your trading.
  > > >
  > > > brian_z
  > > >
  > > >
  > > > --- In [email protected] <amibroker%
  40yahoogroups.com>, "Louis
  > > Préfontaine"
  > > > <rockprog80@> wrote:
  > > > >
  > > > > Hi Brian,
  > > > >
  > > > > Thanks for those explanation. I will experiment with this
  > > tonight
  > > > and
  > > > > tomorrow. However, I am not sure about something: are you 
  saying
  > > > that the
  > > > > only thing I need to know is simply to set the STdev at 2 or 3
  > > (if
  > > > it's what
  > > > > I want to do) and then automatically ATR will be use that new
  > > StDev?
  > > > >
  > > > > I like your idea to make two groups; one with high volatility 
  and
  > > > one with
  > > > > low volatility. Would you consider it would be possible to
  > > adjust
  > > > the
  > > > > stop-loss differently for each group? And how do you filter 
  the
  > > top
  > > > > performers?
  > > > >
  > > > > As always, thanks for your help!
  > > > >
  > > > > Louis
  > > > >
  > > > > 2008/2/24, brian_z111 <brian_z111@>:
  > > > > >
  > > > > > Sorry Louis, a mistake there.
  > > > > >
  > > > > > I am getting my standard deviations mixed up between 
  programs.
  > > > > >
  > > > > > In AB StDev is 1 by default and is in $values.
  > > > > > To use AB's StDev at 2,3 deviations etc just multiply StDev
  > > (C,10)
  > > > * 2
  > > > > > etc
  > > > > > To use it as StDev%
  > > > > > StDevPercent = StDev(C,Periods)/MA(C,Periods) * 100;
  > > > > >
  > > > > > For STANDARD measures of deviation use StDev.
  > > > > > For relative measures of deviation use ATR as % or StDev as 
  %
  > > > > >
  > > > > > One example:
  > > > > >
  > > > > > Say you want to compare the performance of a fast horse and 
  a
  > > slow
  > > > > > horse. If they both travel 1 StDev in the same time (number 
  of
  > > > > > periods) their performance is equal but the VALUE (QUALITY) 
  of
  > > the
  > > > > > fast horses performance is higher - it's a grade one horse
  > > > compared
  > > > > > to the other horse, which is a grade 2 (using speed as the
  > > > criteria).
  > > > > >
  > > > > > In practice - profit/loss stops might be set at +- 1 
  standard
  > > > > > devation and then filtered for the top performers. The top
  > > > performers
  > > > > > could then be segregated into two watchlists - those with 1
  > > stdev
  > > > >
  > > > > > 2% (high volatility stocks) and those with stdev <=2% (low
  > > > volatility
  > > > > > stocks) - this would allow a comparison of the performance 
  of
  > > that
  > > > > > trading signal/stop loss combination on high and low 
  volatility
  > > > > > stocks.
  > > > > >
  > > > > > brian_z
  > > > > >
  > > > > >
  > > > > > --- In [email protected] <amibroker%
  40yahoogroups.com><amibroker%40yahoogroups.com>,
  > > > > > "brian_z111" <brian_z111@> wrote:
  > > > > > >
  > > > > > > Louis,
  > > > > > >
  > > > > > > >Does anyone know if it is possible to get an absolute 
  value
  > > > ATR?
  > > > > > >
  > > > > > > The Abs() function serves that purpose but I think you 
  mean
  > > > > > something
  > > > > > > else.
  > > > > > >
  > > > > > > ATR is a measure of volatility and it is specific for each
  > > > stock (or
  > > > > > > instrument). The whole idea of it (AFAIK) is to use it on 
  an
  > > > > > > individual
  > > > > > > stock basis.
  > > > > > >
  > > > > > > It can be useful to compare volatility:
  > > > > > >
  > > > > > > 1) internally e.g. against an average of the last (x) 
  days OR
  > > > > > against
  > > > > > > the StDev (standard deviation) of the volatility measure 
  OR
  > > > just use
  > > > > > > StDev of the Close etc on its own.
  > > > > > >
  > > > > > > StDev() function does allow to change the setting between 
  1
  > > or
  > > > 2 etc
  > > > > > >
  > > > > > > 2) externally to the volatility of the market OR a sector
  > > that
  > > > the
  > > > > > > stock is a member of OR compared to another stock in the 
  same
  > > > sector
  > > > > > > etc.
  > > > > > >
  > > > > > > brian_z
  > > > > > >
  > > > > > >
  > > > > > >
  > > > > > > --- In [email protected] <amibroker%
  40yahoogroups.com><amibroker%
  > > 40yahoogroups.com>,
  > > > Graham
  > > > > > <kavemanperth@> wrote:
  > > > > > > >
  > > > > > > > you could try a percentage type
  > > > > > > >
  > > > > > > > ATR(10)/ref(c,-1)*100
  > > > > > > >
  > > > > > > > --
  > > > > > > > Cheers
  > > > > > > > Graham Kav
  > > > > > > > AFL Writing Service
  > > > > > > > http://www.aflwriting.com
  > > > > > > >
  > > > > > > >
  > > > > > > > On 24/02/2008, louisprefontaine <rockprog80@> wrote:
  > > > > > > > > Does anyone know if it is possible to get an absolute
  > > value
  > > > > > ATR?
  > > > > > > I
  > > > > > > > > already use the ATR, but it changes from stock to 
  stock,
  > > > > > > depending on
  > > > > > > > > the value of the stock. Would it be possible to get an
  > > > > > absolute
  > > > > > > value
  > > > > > > > > indicator, like CMF, RSI, etc.? Thanks!
  > > > > > > > >
  > > > > > > > >
  > > > > > > > >
  > > > > > > > > Please note that this group is for discussion between
  > > users
  > > > > > only.
  > > > > > > > >
  > > > > > > > > To get support from AmiBroker please send an e-mail
  > > > directly to
  > > > > > > > > SUPPORT {at} amibroker.com
  > > > > > > > >
  > > > > > > > > For NEW RELEASE ANNOUNCEMENTS and other news always 
  check
  > > > > > DEVLOG:
  > > > > > > > > http://www.amibroker.com/devlog/
  > > > > > > > >
  > > > > > > > > For other support material please check also:
  > > > > > > > > http://www.amibroker.com/support.html
  > > > > > > > >
  > > > > > > > > Yahoo! Groups Links
  > > > > > > > >
  > > > > > > > >
  > > > > > > > >
  > > > > > > > >
  > > > > > > >
  > > > > > >
  > > > > >
  > > > > >
  > > > > >
  > > > >
  > > >
  > >
  > > 
  > >
  >



   

Reply via email to