Herman,

That is certainly true for regular brokerage accounts.
You may however daytrade using smaller accounts on stocks and futures (via CFDs 
- contact for differences) and forex. 
Still doing it below $25K is very risky and CFDs are not allowed for US 
citizens I think.

Best regards,
Tomasz Janeczko
amibroker.com
  ----- Original Message ----- 
  From: Herman 
  To: Tomasz Janeczko 
  Sent: Thursday, March 13, 2008 1:35 AM
  Subject: Re: [amibroker] Re: Interactive Brokers plugin policy change


  Re: > If someone has less than $25K, better forget about daytrading.




  It is not a decision that is up to the trader: the SEC will not let you day 
trade with less than US$25,000:




  
https://www.interactivebrokers.com/Universal/servlet/Registration_v2.formSampleView?ad=day_trading_risk_disclosure.jsp




  You will also have to fill in a questionnaire to obtain day trading 
privileges...




  Best regards,

  herman




  Wednesday, March 12, 2008, 7:15:27 PM, you wrote:




  > Hello,




  > Lots of misconception I can see. 




  > AmiBroker does have direct auto-trading interface to IB 
http://www.amibroker.com/at/,

  > and you should know about that Brian, considering the fact that you

  > are UKB contributor together with Herman,

  > and Herman is just "using AB as a trading platform" and he is doing 
daytrading.




  > Plus IB has international coverage.




  > A "t+3 clearance issue" is different story.

  > It just for IB accounts that have less than $25000 funds,

  > that is why it is non-issue for traders. 




  > If someone has less than $25K, better forget about daytrading.




  > US IRA accounts are another story, but as I wrote Daniel, IRA-style delayed 
clearance

  > is on to-do list.




  > Best regards,

  > Tomasz Janeczko

  > amibroker.com

  > ----- Original Message ----- 

  > From: "brian_z111" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

  > To: <[email protected]>

  > Sent: Wednesday, March 12, 2008 11:51 PM

  > Subject: [amibroker] Re: Interactive Brokers plugin policy change







  >>> I'm glad to see someone else mention the t+3 clearance issue.




  >> I'm amazed that it never seems to get a mention.




  >> Sadly I can't see that any daytrader could or would use AB as a 

  >> trading platform (unless they have AB >> QT >> a broker other than AB.




  >> I guess they use AB for backtesting and go to another platform for 

  >> trading OR sit in the chair between an AB screen and a 

  >> broker/platform screen.




  >> For myself, I will have to start to look at available platforms at 

  >> some stage - I am reluctant because of the energy I have invested in 

  >> AB and also I don't want to code using online platforms (too easy for 

  >> the owner to pinch my code/systems).




  >>> My principal use of AB is to backtest trading strategies and there 

  >>>is 

  >>> no way to take this settlement time into account during a backtest. 




  >> Minimizing turn around time between trades is a rule in 

  >> my 'essentials' list e.g for short term EOD trade, on the close, I 

  >> can get out a little early and get back in next trade the same day 

  >> (at Options Express).




  >> I do account for it in my system evaluation (I will have to get on my 

  >> expectancy soapbox again).




  >> a) use expectancy% as the baseline metric (derived from PowerFactor)

  >> b) use expectancy * ave time in trade to standardize as PA%

  >> (convert to annual return)

  >> c) if I have to wait for the next trade of for technical reasons I 

  >> can't go straight back in, add the average turn around time to ave 

  >> time in trade.




  >> Expectancy/PowerFactor/BiniomialSimulation is a beautiful thing - I 

  >> hope it is good and the mathematicians approve of it.




  >> Even Graham's exposure can be easily managed as above (I tend to work 

  >> everything out my own way instead of struggling to come to grips with 

  >> other people mysterious or hidden logic (sorry Graham - I wanted to 

  >> talk to you about exposure but couldn't fit it in).







  >> brian_z




  >> --- In [email protected], "danielwardadams" 

  >> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:




  >>> I'm glad to see someone else mention the t+3 clearance issue. I 

  >>> primarily trade in IRAs in which the use of margin isn't allowed. 

  >>> Consequently, I always have to wait the 3 day settlement time 

  >> before 

  >>> my funds from a long sell (can't short in IRAs either) are 

  >> available 

  >>> to trade again. In "Cash" accounts and with the use of margin this 

  >>> isn't an issue as the funds can be reused immediately.




  >>> My principal use of AB is to backtest trading strategies and there 

  >> is 

  >>> no way to take this settlement time into account during a backtest. 

  >>> Sometime ago (a year maybe) after I brought this to Tomasz's 

  >>> attention, he said he thought adding this settlement time lag to 

  >> the 

  >>> backtester would be a good thing and thought it might give AB a 

  >>> competitive edge since to his knowledge no other backtesting 

  >> software 

  >>> handled it either.




  >>> At the time, I told him I always just attempted to achieve maximum 

  >>> total returns in my backtests knowing full well I could never 

  >> achieve 

  >>> them because I will always have a portion of my portfolio 

  >> unavailable 

  >>> for trading. 




  >>> To my knowledge this issue has never been addressed and I don't 

  >> know 

  >>> where it fits in the priority of enhancements (?).




  >>> Dan




  >>> Note: I dont think the Broker Feed => Medved QT => Amibroker 

  >> solution 

  >>> to genericizing the plugin issue is a bad idea either.







  >>> --------------------------------------------------------------------

  >> -

  >>> Re your point on scalping.




  >>> > There are people who are doing scalping in an IB--->QT 

  >> environment.

  >>> >I am

  >>> > guessing they are not suffering any substantial efficiency losses

  >>> as they

  >>> > are quite successful.




  >>> Possibly I am mis-understanding something about the way the funds

  >>> from intraday trades are cleared but if I have take 1% on an 

  >> intraday

  >>> trade and then have to wait t+3 for the funds to be available 

  >> haven't

  >>> I reduced my returns to 1%/3?




  >>> If that isn't the case (I don't have to wait 3 days to put the 

  >> closed

  >>> intraday trade funds back to work) then I would love to go to IB

  >>> (based on the number of others who use it and the body of published

  >>> work that will help me make the transition to AT).




  >>> brian_z




  >>> --- In [email protected], "brian_z111" <brian_z111@> wrote:

  >>> >

  >>> > Rakesh,

  >>> > 

  >>> > I am with you on everything there (happy to pay for ad free 

  >>> > enviornment etc).

  >>> > 

  >>> > As per your previous comment:

  >>> > 

  >>> > > > > A solution that covers Broker Feed---->MedVed QT-------> 

  >>> > >>AmiBroker

  >>> > > > can cover

  >>> > > > > the needs of a large portion of the universe of AB clients.

  >>> > 

  >>> > Re your point on scalping.

  >>> > 

  >>> > > There are people who are doing scalping in an IB--->QT 

  >>> environment. 

  >>> > >I am

  >>> > > guessing they are not suffering any substantial efficiency 

  >> losses 

  >>> > as they

  >>> > > are quite successful.

  >>> > 

  >>> > Possibly I am mis-understanding something about the way the funds 

  >>> > from intraday trades are cleared but if I have take 1% on an 

  >>> intraday 

  >>> > trade and then have to wait t+3 for the funds to be available 

  >>> haven't 

  >>> > I reduced my returns to 1%/3?

  >>> > 

  >>> > If that isn't the case (I don't have to wait 3 days to put the 

  >>> closed 

  >>> > intraday trade funds back to work) then I would love to go to IB 

  >>> > (based on the number of others who use it and the body of 

  >> published 

  >>> > work that will help me make the transition to AT).

  >>> > 

  >>> > brian_z

  >>> > 

  >>> >
















  >> Please note that this group is for discussion between users only.




  >> To get support from AmiBroker please send an e-mail directly to 

  >> SUPPORT {at} amibroker.com




  >> For NEW RELEASE ANNOUNCEMENTS and other news always check DEVLOG:

  >> http://www.amibroker.com/devlog/




  >> For other support material please check also:

  >> http://www.amibroker.com/support.html




  >> Yahoo! Groups Links
















  > Please note that this group is for discussion between users only.




  > To get support from AmiBroker please send an e-mail directly to 

  > SUPPORT {at} amibroker.com




  > For NEW RELEASE ANNOUNCEMENTS and other news always check DEVLOG:

  > http://www.amibroker.com/devlog/




  > For other support material please check also:

  > http://www.amibroker.com/support.html

  >  

  > Yahoo! Groups Links




  >     http://groups.yahoo.com/group/amibroker/




  >     Individual Email | Traditional




  >     http://groups.yahoo.com/group/amibroker/join

  >     (Yahoo! ID required)




  >     mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 

  >     mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]




  >     [EMAIL PROTECTED]




  >     http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/

  >  

   

Reply via email to