I'm not clear on:

- Why you want to assign a "1" to make that the highest score
- Why this is any different from adding the ROC(C,55)+ROC(C,200) -
maybe it's not.

Is this for use in the rotation portfolio?

--- In [email protected], "gmorlosky" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Steve - did you make any progress on the Rank Score coding that you 
> might share ?
> 
> --- In [email protected], "steve_almond" <steve2@> wrote:
> >
> > Say I have a group of 20 stocks. I use an exploration to calculate 
> > two different values for each stock, let's say:
> > 
> > 1. C/ref(C,-55)  and
> > 2. C/ref(C,-200)
> > 
> > I want to rank the 20 stocks on each of the two measures and get a 
> > composite score to select the stock which does best overall.
> > 
> > So in this case, I want to rank the stocks on the first measure so 
> > that the best return over 55 days scores 1, second best scores 2 
> and 
> > so on down to the worst stock which scores 20.
> > 
> > Then I rank the stocks over the 200 day return in the same way.
> > 
> > Adding the two scores for each stock gives my overall score - the 
> > lowest number is the "best" stock.
> > 
> > Can anyone tell me how to do this?
> > 
> > Thanks,
> > 
> > Steve
> >
>


Reply via email to