Thanks Graham;

That was exactly what I needed.  I use Valuewhen all the time, for 
some reason I just drew a blank on this.  I think the "buy" variable 
threw me, as I have never really done anything with it except put my 
formula there. 

Anyways, thanks very much.

Safetrading

--- In [email protected], Graham <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Valuewhen is useful for this
> I assume you are entering on same bar as buuy signal. This line 
gives
> you the low of the bar before buy signal
> 
> sell=L<valuewhen(buy,ref(l,-1)-0.01);
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> Cheers
> Graham Kav
> AFL Writing Service
> http://www.aflwriting.com
> 
> 
> 
> 2008/4/26 safetrading <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > This is probably easy for most of you, but I just can't seem to
> >  figure this out.
> >
> >  I'm using one tick above the high of the previous day for an 
entry
> >  point and trying to create an exit rule where for a long 
position,
> >  the exit would be one tick below the low of the day prior to the
> >  entry day ( the same days where I got my entry point from) 
until a
> >  low exists that is above the high of my entry point, at which 
time
> >  the exit would then become one tick below that low and continue 
to
> >  follow the trade like this; sell=L<ref(l,-1)-0.01;
> >
> >  So what I need to do is label and hang on to the "one tick 
below"
> >  the low of the day prior to entering.  I believe I need to use 
the
> >  Hold function, but am not sure how to identify the price point I
> >  need.
> >
> >  Any suggestions would be appreciated.
> >
> >  Thanks,
> >
> >  Safetrading
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >  ------------------------------------
> >
> >  Please note that this group is for discussion between users 
only.
> >
> >  To get support from AmiBroker please send an e-mail directly to
> >  SUPPORT {at} amibroker.com
> >
> >  For NEW RELEASE ANNOUNCEMENTS and other news always check 
DEVLOG:
> >  http://www.amibroker.com/devlog/
> >
> >  For other support material please check also:
> >  http://www.amibroker.com/support.html
> >  Yahoo! Groups Links
> >
> >
> >
> >
>


Reply via email to