Hi,

This version removes a redundency, and correctly handles the case 
where your data is missing values or when the preceding Monday was a 
holliday.

Monday = IIF(DayOfWeek() == 1, 1, 0);
MondayLow = ValueWhen(Monday, Low);

Friday = IIF(DayOfWeek() == 5, 1, 0);
FridayClose = ValueWhen(Friday, Close);

FridayLower = Friday && Close < MondayLow && BarsSince(Monday) == 4;

// Set Filter to 1 if you want all days, including false days.
Filter = FridayLower;
AddColumn(MondayLow, "Monday Low");
AddColumn(FridayClose, "Friday Close");
AddColumn(FridayLower, "Friday Lower");

Mike

--- In [email protected], "Mike" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hi,
> 
> You can try the following. Though, I wonder if you made a mistake 
in 
> your question? You say to "check close of Friday", but then want to 
> filter on "friday low is less than monday low". Which is it, Friday 
> close or Friday low?
> 
> In the code below, I'm assuming that you really wanted to filter on 
> Friday close less than Monday low. Save as a .afl file then run as 
an 
> Exploration over any number of days. Fridays closing lower than the 
> preceding Monday will show with a 1 in the Friday Lower column.
> 
> Note that I have not added any special handling for when the 
> preceding Monday was a holliday. You can try that part yourself ;)
> 
> Monday = IIF(DayOfWeek() == 1, 1, 0);
> MondayLow = ValueWhen(Monday, Low);
> 
> Friday = IIF(DayOfWeek() == 5, 1, 0);
> FridayClose = ValueWhen(Friday, Close);
> 
> FridayLower = Friday && Close < ValueWhen(Monday, MondayLow);
> 
> // Set Filter to 1 if you want all days, including false days.
> Filter = FridayLower;
> AddColumn(MondayLow, "Monday Low");
> AddColumn(FridayClose, "Friday Close");
> AddColumn(FridayLower, "Friday Lower");
> 
> Mike
> 
> --- In [email protected], "loshude8888" <shublok@> wrote:
> >
> > Dear Members,
> > 
> > Plz help me to find out following results using AFL language :
> > 
> > 1. Check low of Monday
> > 2. Check close of Friday
> > 
> > filter : friday low is less than monday low
> > 
> > Thanks in advance.
> > 
> > Regards,
> > Lokesh
> >
>


Reply via email to