The weird thing is Bill, if I do,

Plot( C, "Close", BarColor , styleNoTitle | styleThick*False |
GetPriceStyle() );


Then it's fine. As soon as I replace 'False' with 'BarThick' I get
Error 5.


--- In [email protected], "sidhartha70" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I'm lloking at bars actually Bill. Does that makea difference...?
> 
> --- In [email protected], "wavemechanic" <timesarrow@> wrote:
> >
> > Do you have candlestick chosen for your default setting?  Your code
> works for all except candlestick.
> > 
> > Bill
> >   ----- Original Message ----- 
> >   From: sidhartha70 
> >   To: [email protected] 
> >   Sent: Tuesday, June 17, 2008 7:37 AM
> >   Subject: [amibroker] Boolean to set 'styleThick' in Plot()
> > 
> > 
> >   Hi All,
> > 
> >   I'm trying to make the style of plotting price bars dependent on
some
> >   boolean value... i.e. if the boolean is true then I want
'styleThick'
> >   bars... else normal.
> > 
> >   However, it doesn't seem to be working... the following,
> > 
> >   Plot( C, "Close", BarColor , styleNoTitle | styleThick*BarThick |
> >   GetPriceStyle() ); 
> > 
> >   Gives an incorrect argument type, where 'BarThick' is my booelan.
> > 
> >   If this is not correct, can anyone suggest how I can correct this or
> >   achieve what I want...?
> > 
> >   Thanks
> > 
> > 
> >   ------------------------------------
> > 
> >   Please note that this group is for discussion between users only.
> > 
> >   To get support from AmiBroker please send an e-mail directly to 
> >   SUPPORT {at} amibroker.com
> > 
> >   For NEW RELEASE ANNOUNCEMENTS and other news always check DEVLOG:
> >   http://www.amibroker.com/devlog/
> > 
> >   For other support material please check also:
> >   http://www.amibroker.com/support.html
> >   Yahoo! Groups Links
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> >
>
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > 
> > 
> > 
> >   No virus found in this incoming message.
> >   Checked by AVG. 
> >   Version: 8.0.100 / Virus Database: 270.3.0/1505 - Release Date:
> 6/16/2008 7:20 AM
> >
>


Reply via email to