If you or someone else is interested in writing your own intelligent algorithms in C++ it is certainly a means to do so .
Personally I don't see how it facilitates the more important aspects of intelligent optimization nor the other necessary companion pieces. If I did I'd be moving in that direction . In addition the implementation seems to further remove the likelihood of multi cpu / core utilization for optimization which imho is an absolute necessity going forward . I've already demonstrated how effective this can be with MCO once it came to my attention ( duh ) that this could be accomplished outside of AB . This was of course a proof of concept precursor to adding this capability to IO as well where it is now operational but not quite ready for prime time. _____ From: [email protected] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of progster01 Sent: Sunday, June 22, 2008 12:41 PM To: [email protected] Subject: [amibroker] Re: Particle Swarm Optimization (PSO) Links --- In [email protected], Fred Tonetti <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > An enhanced version of PSO and other intelligent optimization > algorithms have been available for AB for years . Fred, I imagine you are thinking-of/referring-to your IO package - an advanced and powerful TA add-on if ever there was one, I'd certainly agree! Do you not see value though for the long-term in the new optimization plug-in capability? TJ states up-front that the ADK PSO demo is not the be-all, end-all of optimization, PSO or otherwise - but I think it is both a fine demonstration of interfacing with the new plug-in architecture, and also a good source code example of PSO. Wouldn't you agree? _____ I am using the free version of SPAMfighter for private users. It has removed 486 spam emails to date. Paying users do not have this message in their emails. Try SPAMfighter <http://www.spamfighter.com/len> for free now!
