Fred, That's a shame if the forum is going to miss out on the input from someone with years of IT/AB experience and specialist knowledge of optimizing.
Thanks for the response. The grandkids are here and I am building Legos - I'll mull over your answer when the noise abates. brian_z --- In [email protected], Fred Tonetti <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I responded to your questions privately since it's clear my questions and > opinions are not wanted here . > > > > Check your email > > > > _____ > > From: [email protected] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf > Of brian_z111 > Sent: Saturday, July 05, 2008 8:28 PM > To: [email protected] > Subject: [amibroker] Re: AmiBroker 5.14.0 BETA released > > > > > Relax, TJ, and don't take critical questions/remarks as personal > > attacks. > > Yes, I thought Fred's comments were OK. > The questions, and subsequent rebuttals from Tomasz, were actually > helpful to me, especially as they were tech orientated. > > As long as it doesn't become personal either way. > > People make their own judgements on the points - in this case Tomasz > won 4-0 but I was still looking a specific example, from Fred, > of 'what the implications of this implementation' might be, or a > retraction from Fred (now that the discussion has been slammed we > will never know if there was anything in his comments or not). > > An objective critique can be answered and then we all learn something > useful - I don't learn anything from name calling etc. > > brian_z > > --- In [EMAIL PROTECTED] <mailto:amibroker%40yahoogroups.com> ps.com, > Thomas Ludwig <Thomas.Ludwig@> > wrote: > > > > Relax, TJ, and don't take critical questions/remarks as personal > > attacks. > > I'm sure that 99% of us admire you for the excellent work you're > doing - > > sporadic criticism won't change that. > > > > Best regards, > > > > Thomas > > > > > Fred, > > > > > > Maybe you should just stay at version 4.80 or earlier if each and > > > every change is so bad. OK? > > > > > > What is your problem? > > > > > > The all these beta versions are offered free. > > > Majority of users enjoy having such kind of service. > > > > > > You do not. That's OK. But no-one is forcing you to use new betas. > > > > > > Stay at old version and give me a break. Thank you. > > > > > > Best regards, > > > Tomasz Janeczko > > > amibroker.com > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > > From: Fred Tonetti > > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <mailto:amibroker%40yahoogroups.com> ps.com > > > Sent: Saturday, July 05, 2008 5:26 AM > > > Subject: RE: [amibroker] Re: AmiBroker 5.14.0 BETA released > > > > > > > > > That's a large assumption . > > > > > > > > > > > > Before you jump for joy I would advise spending a few hours with > > > AFL to find out what the implications of this as implemented are . > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ---------------------------------------------------------- > --- > > >--------- > > > > > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <mailto:amibroker%40yahoogroups.com> ps.com > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] <mailto:amibroker%40yahoogroups.com> ps.com] > > > On Behalf Of brian_z111 Sent: Friday, July 04, 2008 8:13 PM > > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <mailto:amibroker%40yahoogroups.com> ps.com > > > Subject: [amibroker] Re: AmiBroker 5.14.0 BETA released > > > > > > > > > > > > Tomasz, > > > > > > Compliments on your rethink on QuickAFL. > > > > > > (I haven't tried it yet but I'll take your word for it and > assume > > > Fred is only having teething issues). > > > > > > I wasn't excited when you released the CMA-ES optimizer since I > am > > > not an optimizer, or a mathematician (elegant algorthims don't > > > necessarily turn me on, only elegant solutions to worthwhile > > > problems). > > > > > > All is not lost, however, since I do acknowledge it CMA-ES a > > > pragmatic solution. > > > > > > On the other hand, I am excited about the 'new' QuickAFL on two > > > counts. > > > > > > First, a few of us prodded you about this, via the forum, and we > > > didn't use a sledge hammer, so you get top marks for > observation, > > > understanding and responsiveness. > > > > > > Secondly, illogic always demands a solution and the 'hung' > status > > > of QuickAFL and the Range settingsNOT in AA were annoying > > > illogicalities. > > > > > > In my book, 10/10 for smoothing the logical construct. > > > > > > Many aspects of the underpinning logic of AB are very > frustrating > > > for me and I have to try not to let that spill over into other > > > arenas, which involves a lot of lip bighting on my part, but your > > > recent work forbodes very well for the future. > > > > > > I have been waiting for this. > > > > > > While age diminishes our intellectual capacities, in some minor > > > ways, it adds a breadth and depth that we can't achieve in our > youth. > > > > > > Welcome to the club! > > > > > > Once again - thank you so much - EXCELLENT WORK. > > > > > > brian_z > > > > > > --- In [EMAIL PROTECTED] <mailto:amibroker%40yahoogroups.com> ps.com, > "Tomasz Janeczko" <groups@> > > > > > > wrote: > > > > Hello, > > > > > > > > AmiBroker 5.14.0 BETA is released now: > > > > http://www.amibroke > <http://www.amibroker.com/devlog/2008/07/04/amibroker-5140-> > r.com/devlog/2008/07/04/amibroker-5140- > beta- > > > > > > released/ > > > > > > > CHANGES IN VERSION 5.14.0 (as compared to 5.13.0): > > > > > > > > 1.. added support for Quarterly and Yearly intervals in all > parts > > > > > > of the program > > > > > > > 2.. Changes to drawing made in v5.13 caused improper drawing > > > > > > lines located PAST the last available quote (trendlines and > > > pitchforks) when timestamping method was "START TIME of > interval". > > > This is fixed now. > > > > > > > 3.. Fixed AddSummaryRows so 'onlycols' parameter default > (zero) > > > > > > is applied properly > > > > > > > 4.. Implemeted "Select all" via Ctrl-A keyboard shortcut for > all > > > > > > list (result list in AA for example) > > > > > > > 5.. Mouse cursor shape (moving/sizing) reflects the selected > > > > > > study priority when more than one study exists under mouse > position > > > > > > > 6.. new multiple Volume At Price charts at user-defined points > > > > > > via new PlotVolumeOverlayA function > > > > > > > 7.. QuickAFL can now be used in Automatic Analysis (Settings: > > > > > > General: "Use QuickAFL" - check this box) - this can speed up > > > explorations, scans and backtests by factor of 2+ if range is > less > > > than "all quotations". More on this: > > > http://www.amibroke <http://www.amibroker.com/kb/quickafl> > r.com/kb/quickafl > > > > > > > 8.. Range Bars compression now uses TickSize as "1R step". > > > > > > TickSize defined in the Symbol Information, if its value is > zero, > > > then 1R would be equivalent to 0.01 movement (for backward > compat) > > > > > > > 9.. selecting date in multiple linked charts is now faster > > > > > > because redraw is not made when selected line in higher > compressed > > > interval remains in place > > > > > > > 10.. selector line in linked charts works OK now, regardless > of > > > > > > selected time compression timestamping method > > > > > > > 11.. SetBarsRequired accepts now values -2 in special meaning: > > > > > > reference ALL bars > > > > > > > 12.. Sometimes progress bar did not show the name of > optimization > > > > > > engine used. Now it is fixed > > > > > > > 13.. Status("ActionEx") provides more codes than Status > ("action") > > > > > > to detect special executions states > > > > > > > 14.. Streaming chart update could stall if trend line handle > was > > > > > > clicked in attempt to resize and released in the very same > position > > > (without moving the mouse). Now it is fixed. > > > > > > > 15.. TimeFrameMode() now supports mode == 4 - which expresses > > > > > > RANGE bars in TickSize units (as opposed to mode 3 that uses > > > dollars for backward compatiblity) > > > > > > > 16.. when display chart timing option is turned on and RT > stream > > > > > > is active the application STATUS BAR now displays TOTAL time for > > > all charts, it should be BELOW 1 second for RT trading > > > > > > > Best regards, > > > > Tomasz Janeczko > > > > amibroker.com > > > > > > ---------------------------------------------------------- > --- > > >--------- I am using the free version of SPAMfighter for private > > > users. It has removed 497 spam emails to date. > > > Paying users do not have this message in their emails. > > > Try SPAMfighter for free now! > > > > > > > _____ > > I am using the free version of SPAMfighter for private users. > It has removed 497 spam emails to date. > Paying users do not have this message in their emails. > Try SPAMfighter <http://www.spamfighter.com/len> for free now! >
