Damn well said!
On 8/30/2008 10:58:43 PM, George Loyd ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> I
> don't reply to many emails - in fact VERY few, but this one and many of
> the replies forced me to write something.
>
> Maybe AmiBroker should be more like MetaStock where errors remain for many
> upgrade cycles ( ie months to a year or more) and NO BETA upgrades ever
> occur. In the 6 1/2 years I have used AmiBroker Tomasz has provided
> literally far more than 100 beta versions - FREE of charge, often fixing
> bugs within a few hours to a couple of days. No other investment software
> that I know of does this that fast. MetaStock's
> Enhance Backtester or Optimizer still has included errors in its handling
> of returns - which in my opinion renders it less than useful for "real"
> investment work where money is on the line. Enlighten me if I am wrong.
> Each "one tenth" upgrade for MetaStock costs $99 or more while Tomasz was
> providing 5 "one tenth" upgrades and MANY betas FREE for about the same
> price. Checking MetaStock's manual - AmiBroker's is superior. Now I
> realize this is a comparison with only one other available software
> package,
> but others will fail to generate much improved comparisons. I think I
> would rather still have what AmiBroker provides.
>
> Furthermore Tomasz is a virtual Help file to this message board, although
> I think he w
