Mike, I see what you mean. When I change the settings in AA it changes my results. Shouldn't they stay the same if my formula has this code in it.
Tom > > Tom, > > I don't have any experience trading futures, so cannot give a > competent answer to your question. > > However, if your PositionSize is 1 and the value of Volume is 3, then > using Buy = ...AND PositionSize < .1 * Volume in your code would > prevent that trade since 1 > 0.3. > > Similarly, changing the code to PositionSize > Volume = 0 is > meaningless since you are saying PositionSize > 0 (i.e. your code is > first setting Volume to zero then checking if PositionSize is greater > than that result). > > Mike > > --- In [email protected], "professor77747" <professor@> > wrote: > > > > In the AA porfolio tab, I have Max Open Position set at 1 > > I have Limit Trade size % at 10 and I have the disable trade size > > limit when bar is at zero checked. > > > > I added AND PositionSize < Volume * 0.10; to my buy statement. The > > reults changed dramatically. I only had 8 trades instead of 45. > > > > I am trading 1 future contract. Would this make a difference? I have > > checked the missing trades and the volume was 3 contracts on one, > > zero on another, 19 on the third, and zero on a fourth. This doesn't > > make sense to me. > > > > Also, if I change the > > > > AND PositionSize < Volume * 0.10; > > to > > AND PositionSize > Volume = 0; > > > > I get results that are that are the same as I get without adding any > > of this. However, the trades are still missing. > > > > Tom > > > > > > >
