Hello,

Nothing like that exists if you use IQFeed DIRECTLY 
http://www.amibroker.com/video/IQFeed.html

You are just making things more complicated going 
iqfeed->qcollector->metastock->ab way.

You or QCollector may have changed volume scaling. Check
File->Database Settings->Configure
or check QCollector settings.

Best regards,
Tomasz Janeczko
amibroker.com
  ----- Original Message ----- 
  From: Louis P. 
  To: [email protected] 
  Sent: Tuesday, September 09, 2008 7:13 PM
  Subject: Re: [amibroker] Re: Anyone has strange volume readings from May with 
DTN IQ?


  Maybe it has something to do with using QCollector to change the data into 
Metastock format and then using this into AB?

  It is VERY strange.  Each and every of my tickers show volume about 1000 
times higher than normal on May 6 and May 7 and about 100 times higher after 
that.

  Louis


  2008/9/9 murthysuresh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

    i dont have it that way. it looks ok to me. i had issues only wiht 
    ener and deleted and added it again.
    maybe you may want to try that.


    --- In [email protected], "Louis P." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
    >

    > Each and every symbol. May 6 and May 7 shows incredibly high 
    volume for
    > each symbols, but then even after volume is still higher than 
    before (maybe
    > 100 times higher).
    > 
    > Very strange!
    > 
    > Louis
    > 

    > 2008/9/9 murthysuresh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

    > 
    > > what symbol. i had issues with some, deleted and reloaded them.

    > > --- In [email protected] <amibroker%
    40yahoogroups.com>, "Louis P."

    > > <rockprog80@> wrote:
    > > >
    > > > Anyone?
    > > >
    > > > Louis
    > > >
    > > > 2008/9/5 Louis P. <rockprog80@>
    > > >
    > > > > Hi,
    > > > >
    > > > > I just realized that for every stock volume jumped like 
    tenfold or
    > > > > one-hundred fold in May. I use DTN IQ data with QCollector.
    > > Anyone had this
    > > > > same problem?
    > > > >
    > > > > Thanks,
    > > > >
    > > > > Louis
    > > > >
    > > >
    > >
    > > 
    > >
    >




   

Reply via email to