I prefer C(5) just because it has same format as Trade Station
  ----- Original Message ----- 
  From: Dennis Brown 
  To: [email protected] 
  Sent: Thursday, February 19, 2009 8:47 AM
  Subject: Re: [amibroker] A shorter syntax to reference past elements of array


  Herman,


  You can also take the perspective that the whole array is being shifted 
forward (right shift) 5 bars.  That brings the past bars forward.  While I 
scratched my head a bit before voting about no C(-5) option to match the Ref() 
convention, if there had not been a Ref() convention to start with, I would 
have gone for the positive number bringing the array forward in time.  In other 
words, Ref() is "referring" to bars in the past with negative numbers, while 
the new shorthand is shifting bar arrays forward in time.  So looking at it 
from that perspective, I am comfortable with it as a NEW operator type 
explained as shifting bars in the array.


  BR,
  Dennis




  On Feb 19, 2009, at 11:20 AM, Herman wrote:


    Sorry , but imo the new forms are critic and counter intuitive.


    C(5) looks back 5 bars.... what would looking forward look like? C(-5)? 


    imo, very confusing. I can't help but wonder what made this idea surface 
:-)) 


    herman




    Thursday, February 19, 2009, 11:08:25 AM, you wrote:


    > Hello,


    > As a convenience feature I was contemplating for some time to allow
    > shorter syntax to very common operation of referring to past elements of 
the array.
    > As you now current syntax to refer to past is:


    > Ref( array, -bars )


    > So close five bars back is Ref( C, -5 )


    > I don't have any technical problem with adding new
    > operator that will make it shorter,
    > but I am wondering about the most preferrable "form",
    > that is easy to use and does not create confusion. 


    > So I would like to ask you which 
    > "short form" would you prefer.
    > - c...@5 
    > - C#5 
    > - C(5) 
    > - I don't like the idea at all


    > Please use this poll to vote:
    > http://finance.groups.yahoo.com/group/amibroker/surveys?id=2828485


    > Thank you.


    > Best regards,
    > Tomasz Janeczko
    > amibroker.com




    > ------------------------------------


    > **** IMPORTANT PLEASE READ ****
    > This group is for the discussion between users only.
    > This is *NOT* technical support channel.


    > TO GET TECHNICAL SUPPORT send an e-mail directly to 
    > SUPPORT {at} amibroker.com


    > TO SUBMIT SUGGESTIONS please use FEEDBACK CENTER at
    > http://www.amibroker.com/feedback/
    > (submissions sent via other channels won't be considered)


    > For NEW RELEASE ANNOUNCEMENTS and other news always check DEVLOG:
    > http://www.amibroker.com/devlog/


    > Yahoo! Groups Links




















  

Reply via email to