Correction.

The comparison was 0.8242/0.8179 (N/50*N), an extraordinary convergence and 
will within sample error for N.

Even more astounding, to me, the pattern frequency was also very similar, which 
is counter intuitive ... I expected a much lower frequency occurrence for the 
'bullish pattern' in a bear market.

--- In [email protected], "brian_z111" <brian_z...@...> wrote:
>
> Just a heads up for newcomers.
> 
> 2008 was an extraordinary year that will be in our databases for years to 
> come.
> 
> IMO it is worth preserving a database for the year ... it is a lot easier to 
> do it now than to try and isolate the 'bear year' data later.
> 
> It can be very instructive to run tests in a contrary year.
> 
> For example:
> 
> - I ran a bull pattern on 2008 bear EOD data 
> - Yahoo adjusted ... daily ...S&P500 == a - 50% bear market
> - it is a high frequency pattern so N (sample number) was very high
> - it is not a tradeable pattern as such ... only indicative of tendencies
> - after the event occurred the liklihood of X occurring was 0.8411 
> (probability)
> - tested on JimSwindles Yahoo US database ... NYSE stocks 1997 - 2007 == a 
> +100% bull market with a significant down period in the middle of it
> - sample size was approx 50 * the previous N and the probability of the 
> reactive event occuring was 0.8179
> 
> To me that is an optimistic result i.e. the bullish effect is persistent in a 
> bear market and consistent between a bull and a bear market, with a 
> significant N.
> 
> It will be relatively difficult in the future to obtain an intraday database, 
> for the bear 2008 bear cycle.... worth keeping if you have one already?
>


Reply via email to