Ed,

I'm using Norgate Premium Data, including delisted U.S. data history.

Mike

--- In [email protected], "Edward Pottasch" <empotta...@...> wrote:
>
> hello Mike,
> 
> Nice summary. Have 1 question: what EOD data base do you use for backtesting. 
> Does it also contain symbols of companies that went bankrupt or have been 
> subject to M&A?
> 
> thanks, Ed
> 
> 
> 
>   ----- Original Message ----- 
>   From: Mike 
>   To: [email protected] 
>   Sent: Wednesday, April 29, 2009 1:19 PM
>   Subject: [amibroker] Re: Some more Question
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
>   Hi,
> 
>   I've done a lot of reading, but have only been live trading for 2 years. 
> There are far more experienced contributors to this forum than me.
> 
>   That being said, my background is in computer science, and I've been a 
> software developer for almost 20 years. That has allowed me a certain level 
> of comfort with much of what AmiBroker has to offer. Though, my usage has 
> been primarily coding in AFL. I do very little charting other than to show 
> price and entry/exit points.
> 
>   As far as trading goes; I run an exploration every night on end of day 
> data. My strategy has had success identifying a generic scenario that 
> averages a modest return per trade after a short holding period.
> 
>   As such, I apply the exploration over all U.S. stocks in hopes of 
> maximizing the actual number of signals. I generate anywhere from a handful 
> to 200 signals on any given night. Fewer during down trends, more during 
> sideways and up trends.
> 
>   I use limit orders below the market, so only a fraction of my orders ever 
> get filled. However, I still end up with several hundred trades per year. The 
> holding period generally ranges from overnight to 10 days on the outside, 
> usually closer to 3-5 days. I exit at market open the morning after a sell 
> signal generated from the night before.
> 
>   My exploration generates a format very close to what is required by 
> Interactive Brokers basket orders. I export the exploration results as .csv 
> file, load them into Excel, apply a custom macro to further refine the 
> format, give it a quick looking over as a sanity check, then upload the 
> basket order to Interactive Brokers and submit it. Eventually I hope to do 
> all of this directly from AmiBroker using the Interactive Brokers plugin. I 
> just haven't gotten around to it.
> 
>   As far as analysis goes; The strategy uses a combination of indicators and 
> liquidity filters to isolate the symbols of interest. In a nutshell, I'm 
> looking for stocks that are upwardly trending in the long term, but have very 
> recently been beaten down, in expectation that the price drop is an over 
> reaction and will recover somewhat over the next few days. It is not 
> necessary that the price fully recover, just a quick pop of a few percent.
> 
>   I use custom backtesting code to apply money management and dynamic 
> position sizing. The custom backtesting code also produces custom metrics, 
> one of which is based on ulcer performance index multiplied by a number of 
> weighted factors relating to drawdown, hold time and number of trades. This 
> is used as the target for walk forward optimization.
> 
>   I have done walk forward analysis (WFA) dating back from 1995 to the 
> present. Along with a number of optimization parameters, I have also tested 
> with different money management schemes and exit times (e.g. exit on close 
> vs. next day).
> 
>   I have experimented with in sample (IS) window periods ranging from 3 years 
> to 3 months, and out of sample (OOS) window periods ranging from 1 month to 1 
> year. A 24 month IS and 6 month OOS were the most consistent for me in 
> conjunction with a money management policy of taking as many trades as 
> possible, not to exceed a fixed fraction of equity on any given trade, 
> dipping into margin as necessary.
> 
>   The ratio of OOS/IS turns out to be 0.25 which is consistent with Robert 
> Pardo in "The Evaluation and Optimization of Trading Strategies", though that 
> was not a specific goal in my analysis. I plan to perform further WFA using a 
> wider variety of money management schemes, including more on the theories of 
> Ralph Vince as per his "The Handbook of Portfolio Mathematics" as well as Van 
> Tharp as per his "Definitive Guide to Position Sizing".
> 
>   I have spent some time attempting to validate my results as more than blind 
> chance via random entries and random exits as per Howard Bandy "Quantitative 
> Trading Systems" as well as some limited analysis using Minitab. I've done a 
> first pass at applying my signals to detrended data as per David Aronson in 
> "Evidence Based Technical Analysis", but have more work to do there.
> 
>   Prior to the introduction of non exhaustive optimizers such as CMA-ES, 
> Tribes, etc. I spent some time experimenting with the Taguchi Method in an 
> attempt to minimize variance in my returns and identify those parameters that 
> most contributed to the desired results. By using fractional factorial arrays 
> of parameter values, I was able to reduce the number of combinations that 
> needed to be backtested (i.e. non exhaustive). The primary drawback being 
> that fractional factorial arrays obscure interactions between parameters. I 
> did not follow the approach through to a tidy conclusion. But, it was 
> interesting.
> 
>   Due to the nature of my strategy (thousands of symbols, foreign reference, 
> several optimization variables, custom backtest code, etc.) individual 
> backtests have proven very time consuming on an entry level laptop, leading 
> to the purchase of far more powerful equipment. Still, the processing demands 
> are currently the limiting factor to deeper analysis. That and my own limited 
> free time.
> 
>   My hope is that Tomasz will come out with a very low priced "server 
> edition" of AmiBroker that consists only of the backtesting engine, without 
> any GUI, such that dozens of licences can be purchased and deployed on a 
> compute grid rented for pennies by the hour (think Amazon EC2 but running 
> Windows, e.g. GoGrid). I've got my own incomplete application that could 
> drive such a setup. Fred's IO is an example of the concept running on a 
> limited number of servers on a LAN.
> 
>   Grid Computing has already arrived. All that remains is to leverage it! If 
> I ever finish my application, I'll pass it on to Tomasz to see if he's 
> interested in the grid approach :)
> 
>   Sorry if this post is longer than you expected. I've had a number of 
> personal email exchanges with members of the forum, regarding their 
> approaches and coding experiences, and have found them to be interesting and 
> educational. For that reason, I figured I'd offer you a complete answer, 
> since you asked ;)
> 
>   For those lurking in the background, feel free to hit delete! Or, better 
> yet, add a description of your own usage pattern to the thread.
> 
>   Mike
> 
>   --- In [email protected], Brian Smith <besmith70@> wrote:
>   >
>   > Hey Mike,
>   > 
>   > Care to mention how you use Amibroker for analysis and trading?
>   > Have been really impressed by your level of knowledge in general...
>   > 
>   > Regards.
>   > 
>   > 
>   > 
>   > On Tue, Apr 28, 2009 at 7:20 PM, Mike <sfclimbers@> wrote:
>   > 
>   > >
>   > >
>   > > Sometimes it's fun. Now, off to the climbing gym for even more fun ;)
>   > >
>   > > http://www.planetgranite.com/locations/belmont/bl_tour.php
>   > >
>   > > Mike
>   > >
>   > >
>   > > --- In [email protected] <amibroker%40yahoogroups.com>,
>   > > "brian_z111" <brian_z111@> wrote:
>   > > >
>   > > > You are doing a very good job Mike.
>   > > >
>   > > > --- In [email protected] <amibroker%40yahoogroups.com>, "Mike"
>   > > <sfclimbers@> wrote:
>   > > > >
>   > > > > 1. It's a program to allow you to manage a "batch" of "jobs" where a
>   > > job is defined as an AmiBroker operation such as a backtest, 
> exploration or
>   > > scan, and a batch is a collection of jobs to be run.
>   > > > >
>   > > > > 2. It is not that running batch files is particularly important. 
> But,
>   > > it may be useful if you find yourself repeatedly wanting to run a 
> series of
>   > > jobs and you don't want to hang around waiting for each to finish before
>   > > firing off the next one.
>   > > > >
>   > > > > You can download the program from the Files section of this site. It
>   > > includes a user guide that may help clarify its usage. I haven't 
> personally
>   > > made use of it, so cannot offer much more than that by way of 
> description.
>   > > > >
>   > > > > Relating to your earlier thread, Batman does highlight yet another
>   > > advantage of AmiBroker over other backtesters; AmiBroker is exposed as 
> an
>   > > OLE object and thus can be driven externally using COM from any other
>   > > language (e.g. C++, Java, JScript, etc).
>   > > > >
>   > > > > Mike
>   > > > >
>   > > > > --- In [email protected] <amibroker%40yahoogroups.com>,
>   > > "caternore" <caternore@> wrote:
>   > > > > >
>   > > > > > Mike,
>   > > > > >
>   > > > > > This may sound stupid, but I have 2 questions
>   > > > > >
>   > > > > > 1)what is a batch manager?
>   > > > > >
>   > > > > > 2)why is running batch files important?
>   > > > > >
>   > > > > > Thank you
>   > > > > > ACE
>   > > > > >
>   > > > > >
>   > > > > > --- In [email protected] <amibroker%40yahoogroups.com>,
>   > > "Mike" <sfclimbers@> wrote:
>   > > > > > >
>   > > > > > > 1. Batman is a batch manager for running batch files. It is
>   > > available in the files section of this group.
>   > > > > > >
>   > > > > > > 2. I believe that it is still an issue. I believe that it means
>   > > that the categorization of symbols is limited to a tree of depth 2 
> rather
>   > > than the 4 actually available from ICB (
>   > > http://www.icbenchmark.com/icb_structure.html). Unless you're trying to
>   > > run a strategy against the less refined granularity, it should not be an
>   > > issue. Even so, you could probably create a watchlist and add all the
>   > > symbols from the more refined categorizations into it, thereby 
> creating, in
>   > > effect, the less granular categorization.
>   > > > > > >
>   > > > > > > 3. I believe that this is still an issue. Easy workaround as
>   > > described by Norgate in the blurb provided.
>   > > > > > >
>   > > > > > > Mike
>   > > > > > >
>   > > > > > > --- In [email protected] <amibroker%40yahoogroups.com>,
>   > > "caternore" <caternore@> wrote:
>   > > > > > > >
>   > > > > > > > Hello all again, I have some more question after doing some
>   > > research.
>   > > > > > > >
>   > > > > > > > 1) What is Batman
>   > > > > > > >
>   > > > > > > > 2 )I was looking at the Norgate data site when I came across
>   > > this.
>   > > > > > > > (Unfortunately as AmiBroker only supports two levels of
>   > > classifications we've decided (after a quick user poll) to provide ICB
>   > > levels 3 & 4 only.)
>   > > > > > > >
>   > > > > > > > What does this mean and have this issue been resolved?
>   > > > > > > >
>   > > > > > > > 3) Another question from the Norgate Data site.
>   > > > > > > >
>   > > > > > > > (Why does the volume on the S&P 500, S&P 1500, NASDAQ 
> Composite,
>   > > NYSE Composite, and weekly charts of ASX Indices sometimes show as a
>   > > negative number?
>   > > > > > > >
>   > > > > > > > By design, AmiBroker stores volume data internally in a data
>   > > structure known as a 32 bit signed integer. This data structure can 
> store
>   > > whole numbers in the range of -2,147,483,648 through 2,147,483,647. If 
> the
>   > > volume figure exceeds the maximum figure, an "overflow" condition 
> occurs and
>   > > the volume wraps around to a negative number. For example, the NYSE
>   > > Composite index had a volume of 3,745,144,031 on Friday 3 May 2008 which
>   > > significantly exceeds the amount. This is why negative volume is shown 
> on
>   > > days of very high volume in those few high-volume indexes.
>   > > > > > > > A workaround is available inside AmiBroker, allowing you to
>   > > divide the volume by a factor. To implement this click File -> Database
>   > > Settings then click the Configure button. In the "Divide Volume By" 
> field
>   > > enter a number (eg. 10 or 100 or 1000 - right now 10 seems to be 
> effective
>   > > across all the US markets for the time being).
>   > > > > > > > A better solution would be for AmiBroker to use a bigger or
>   > > better data structure (eg. 64 bit unsigned integer) or a floating point
>   > > field to accommodate such high volumes. If you would like this to be
>   > > implemented within AmiBroker please login to the AmiBroker Feedback 
> Center.
>   > > After logging in then click here to show issues #636 and add a comment
>   > > requesting a permanent solution to the issue.)
>   > > > > > > >
>   > > > > > > > Has this been resolved?
>   > > > > > > >
>   > > > > > > > Thank you.
>   > > > > > > > ACE
>   > > > > > > >
>   > > > > > >
>   > > > > >
>   > > > >
>   > > >
>   > >
>   > > 
>   > >
>   >
>


Reply via email to