Kus --
You are making a classic afl mistake that almost all of us have made
before (more than once for me). The mistake is that:
nn is an *array* which you have on both the left and right side of the =
sign in your equation nn = IIf(etc. You are assuming, incorrectly, that
the new value of Ref(nn, -1) will always be calculated before it is used
in the equation.
This is a good example of when you need use looping with explicit array
indexing.
One alternative which could reduce the code within the loop might be:
temp = (C-Ref(C,-1))/Ref(C,-1);
n[0]=100;
for(i-1; i<BarCount; i++){
n[i] = n[i-1];
if(V[i]<V[i-1]) n[i] *= 1 + temp[i];
}
-- Keith
Kusnady wrote:
Dear All,
I found some un-answered questions about array processing of the AFL.
--------------------------------------------------------------------
nn = 100;
nn = IIf(V<Ref(V,-1), Ref(nn,-1) + (C-Ref(C,-1))/Ref(C,-1) *
Ref(nn,-1), Ref(nn,-1));
Plot(nn,"",colorYellow);
//----------------------------------------------
n[0]=100;
for(i=1;i<BarCount;i++)
{
if(V[i] < V[i-1])
n[i] = n[i-1] + (C[i]-C[i-1])/C[i-1] * n[i-1];
else
n[i] = n[i-1];
}
Plot(n,"",colorRed);
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Array of "n" is supp osed to be the same as "nn" in the AFL below, but
when they are plotted, they are not the same...It is the formula of
NVI....
Could you help whey "n" is not the same as "nn"? or Do I make a mistake?
Thanks
Kus
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Yahoo! Mail Sekarang Lebih Cepat dan Lebih Bersih. Rasakan bedanya!
<http://id.mail.yahoo.com>
