Herman
 
Thank you for getting back to me
 
The areas that seem to be different is in RSI values and High and Lows (By a 
large Margin) when looking at the charts. I don't use High and Low in my 
strategies
 
Frank
 


--- On Tue, 7/21/09, Herman <[email protected]> wrote:


From: Herman <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [amibroker] Data Feed
To: "fpnetwind" <[email protected]>
Date: Tuesday, July 21, 2009, 1:32 PM


  




Changing data is always a nice way to test the robustness of a system. While 
there are differences between various sources of historical data (there always 
will be) there will be very similar differences between various real-Time data 
feeds. If your system works with one type, using historical or Real-Time data, 
and not on another you should analyze why this is so before trading any real 
money. 
 
Data dependency can often be traced to signals being based on the High or Low 
price triggers.


best regards,
herman


Tuesday, July 21, 2009, 9:18:20 AM, you wrote:


> I just signed up for IQFEED, but finding my indicator outputs are not
> matching the results from Yahoo feed. RSI is off, candlestick chart is off. 
> Volume is close.






> I know Yahoo truncates two decimal points on Volume and IQFeed doesn't, but
> when I backtest using the same formulas with AmiBroker the results are like
> day and night (Same Settings  for backtesting)






> Is there something I am missing? Or do I need to adjust my trade formulas 
> based on the Data Feed


> Frank






> ------------ --------- --------- ------


> **** IMPORTANT PLEASE READ ****
> This group is for the discussion between users only.
> This is *NOT* technical support channel.


> TO GET TECHNICAL SUPPORT send an e-mail directly to 
> SUPPORT {at} amibroker.com


> TO SUBMIT SUGGESTIONS please use FEEDBACK CENTER at
> http://www.amibroke r.com/feedback/
> (submissions sent via other channels won't be considered)


> For NEW RELEASE ANNOUNCEMENTS and other news always check DEVLOG:
> http://www.amibroke r.com/devlog/


> Yahoo! Groups Links



























      

Reply via email to