Ah worked it out.

The first line of code in my function exits if not in actionIndicator mode, in 
which printf doesn't work.

Thanks for your help Tomasz.
Regards,
Jules.

--- In [email protected], "Tomasz Janeczko" <gro...@...> wrote:
>
> You need to put your formula in the indicator and make sure that given chart 
> is selected.
> The interpretation will only show the text of active (focused) chart.
> 
> Best regards,
> Tomasz Janeczko
> amibroker.com
> ----- Original Message ----- 
> From: "Julian" <juliangoods...@...>
> To: <[email protected]>
> Sent: Sunday, August 16, 2009 2:13 PM
> Subject: [amibroker] Re: ADK printf
> 
> 
> > Hi Tomasz,
> > this just isn't working for me. Can you please tell me where I'm going 
> > wrong?
> >
> > void Amibroker::printf(const char * output){
> > AmiVar args[21];
> > for (int i=1; i<21; i++){
> > args[i].type = VAR_FLOAT;
> > args[i].val = EMPTY_VAL;
> > }
> > args[0].type = VAR_STRING;
> > args[0].string = (char *)SI->Alloc(100);
> > strcpy(args[0].string, "Testing printf %0.0f");
> > args[1].val = 3.0f;
> >
> > AmiVar result = SI->CallFunction("printf", 21, args);
> > }
> >
> > I'm getting a return value of 1 in the result AmiVar. I've been through 
> > with debugger and all inputs look fine. It executes no 
> > problems but I get no output in Interpretation window.
> >
> > It makes no difference if I input a single string with no format params 
> > either.
> >
> > Regards,
> > Jules.
> >
> >
> >
> > ------------------------------------
> >
> > **** IMPORTANT PLEASE READ ****
> > This group is for the discussion between users only.
> > This is *NOT* technical support channel.
> >
> > TO GET TECHNICAL SUPPORT send an e-mail directly to
> > SUPPORT {at} amibroker.com
> >
> > TO SUBMIT SUGGESTIONS please use FEEDBACK CENTER at
> > http://www.amibroker.com/feedback/
> > (submissions sent via other channels won't be considered)
> >
> > For NEW RELEASE ANNOUNCEMENTS and other news always check DEVLOG:
> > http://www.amibroker.com/devlog/
> >
> > Yahoo! Groups Links
> >
> >
> >
>


Reply via email to