Hi AF,

I wouldn't go that far and say it's a "nightmare". I have implemented it for 
rather complext calculations and it works just fine. :-)

Sure, if seperate charts for each time frame works for you- that's of course 
the easiest way. But please remember, different users- different needs.

But in my case, I don't only want to save chart space for other info, but I 
also have a scanner running in the background searching stocks suitable for 
trading and which ones have my buy/sell signals. Then I need all 3 TFs in one 
code with high resolution data- not in 3 charts. 

Then finally it's very much worth the effort- at least in my case. I can 
promise you that. I have never had such a good results as I have with this 
solution. :-)

Regards,

Jorgen

--- In [email protected], "af_1000000" <af_1000...@...> wrote:
>
> Hi Jorgen,
> 
> Thanks for the example. I was away, so I did not respond earlier.
> Your method is straightforward : for any given period of the higher timeframe 
> use current values of the lowest resolution timeframe, for previous periods 
> of the the higher timeframe use the values at the end of these periods. To 
> implement MA, using this method, is simple. To implement more complicated 
> indicators would be a nightmare. To combine two data streams (one from higher 
> timeframe and from the lowest timeframe) intelligently to produce more 
> complex indicators is not worth the effort. Two separate charts: one for the 
> higher timeframe and one for the lowest timeframe will do the job.
> 
> AF
>


Reply via email to