I just re-installed 5.29 on top of ver 5.26 and it installed OK.

None of the problems I encountered the first time. No idea why the 
difference.

Ara


----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Richard" <[email protected]>
To: <[email protected]>
Sent: Sunday, October 11, 2009 10:52 AM
Subject: [amibroker] Re: AB vers. 5.29


>
> Ara,
> When I went to beta 5.27 it blew out my database. I contacted support and 
> was told If I didn't make a backup "tough luck" you'll have to build a new 
> one.  The change (as I recall started with 5.27)  I hope this isn't your 
> problem.  I reinstalled 5.20 and am running it with no problem. I don't 
> know how this will be resolved with 5.30 ... does anybody know?
>
> Dick H
>
> --- In [email protected], "Ara Kaloustian" <a...@...> wrote:
>>
>> I am having a lot of trouble installing AB version 5.29.... the database 
>> contains very little data in "Groups"
>>
>> I am running one QuotesPlus database and two installations of EOD 
>> Amibrokers, Version 5.26 (old database) and 5.29 (new database) both 
>> getting their data from the single QP database.
>>
>> My original installation of version 5.26 still works fine, but 5.29 has 
>> very poor data integrity as it contains far fewer issues in Groups.
>>
>> For example, Common Stocks group contains only 384 issues (version 5.26 
>> contains 5170 issues  for Common Stocks).
>>
>> I recall a couple of others had similar issues.
>>
>> Did anyone experience this and found a solution?
>>
>> Thanks
>>
>> ara
>>
>
>
>
>
> ------------------------------------
>
> **** IMPORTANT PLEASE READ ****
> This group is for the discussion between users only.
> This is *NOT* technical support channel.
>
> TO GET TECHNICAL SUPPORT send an e-mail directly to
> SUPPORT {at} amibroker.com
>
> TO SUBMIT SUGGESTIONS please use FEEDBACK CENTER at
> http://www.amibroker.com/feedback/
> (submissions sent via other channels won't be considered)
>
> For NEW RELEASE ANNOUNCEMENTS and other news always check DEVLOG:
> http://www.amibroker.com/devlog/
>
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
> 


Reply via email to