I want to have ~~~equity present in AmiBroker after my backtest so I can create FastTrack fnu of it. I can do this with Batman 1.6, but Batman 2.4 seems to run "Batman util.afl" as Backtest after each of my backtest (and exploration) jobs leaving me with 10000 as the equity value for all dates.
Here is what I do. 1. Run a batch that consists of 2 jobs. 2. First job is backtest to create ~~~equity. 3. Second job is exploration to create fnu file of ~~~equity. Batman 2.4 does ... 1. Runs my first backtest. 2. Runs its "Batman util.afl" overwriting my ~~~equity with 10000 for all dates. 3. Runs my second job which is an exploration to create fnu file of ~~~equity but fnu values are all at 10000 via "Batman util.afl" backtest creation of ~~~equity. --- In [email protected], DIANE TONETTI <ftone...@...> wrote: > > > What is it you are trying to accomplish ... > > On Fri, Oct 30, 2009 at 4:45 PM, bistrader wrote: > > It looks like Batman 2.4 loads and does a backtest on "batman > util.afl" after each job. This afl creates ~~~equity of 10000. Am I > right on what Batman does? Think so. If so, how do I get at ~~~equity > prior to "batman util.afl" backtest or how do I turn off the "batman > util.afl" backtest? Some process to get at ~~~equity before Batman 2.4 > destroys it. > > --- In amibro...@yahoogrou ps.com <mailto:[email protected]> , > "bistrader" <bistrader@ ..> wrote: > > > > Was using Batman 1.6 and finally went to 2.4, but am having problems. > > Here is example of what happens via Batman runs. This is ONE batch > > run in Batman where #1 is listed first and #2 is listed second. 1. Run > > backtest first and all is well in both 1.6 and 2.4; 2. Run exploration > > on ~~~equity and all is well in 1.6, but in 2.4 the ~~~equity values > > are all the same, in my case all at 10000 which is wrong; 3. I even > > look at ~~~equity after above Batman batch run and all values are > > 10000 via version 2.4 and are correct in 1.6 > > I do this manually via AmiBroker alone and all is well. Manual run of > > backtest (see #1 above) produces correct values in ~~~equity. > > Any thoughts? > > Bert > > <mailto:[email protected]> > > <http://us.ard.yahoo.com/SIG=14hdk3agg/M=493064.12016308.12445700.8674578/D=groups/S=1705632198:NC/Y=YAHOO/EXP=1256942796/L=/B=9Us3EUSO5_c-/J=1256935596517199/K=pb5qyxHseX.wX9Idd6Ph7Q/A=3848642/R=0/SIG=131eshi2t/*http://searchmarketing.yahoo.com/arp/srchv2.php?o=US2004&cmp=Yahoo&ctv=Groups3&s=Y&s2=&s3=&b=50> >
