Ronald, Have you considered hiring an experienced dll programmer to do this for you. From what I see, building a dll function based on what you have shown in your previous emails will be reasonably straight. To process array in C++ is straight forward through loops - Incidentially, the array processing ability of AB is most probably built using the same C technology. I'll be happy to give you a quote if you're interested and contact me on a private email /Paul.
--- In [email protected], Ronald Davis <xok...@...> wrote: > > I have no C++ programming skills at all, so making an AFL plugin is out of > the question for me. > Also, I imagine it would be a lot of work for C++ programmers to create > Plugins because of > the inability of DLLS to access the fantastic array processing that is > unique to Amibroker. > > I have attached a chart of UKW which, IMHO, clearly shows top pivots and the > bottom pivots. > > Years ago,when my son showed me the Amibroker software, > I concluded that it should be possible to develop AFL smoothing techniques > that would > produce custom indicator lines that would display the technical status of any > symbol. > > Hopefully, some Amibroker readers of this Yahoogroup agree with my view that > these chart lines > really do a good job of showing the top pivots and the bottom pivots. > > This email is a suggestion that we form an Amibroker/Saul Alinsky community > organizer group in > an attempt to convince T J to include Encryption Ability WITHIN the AFL > editor. > IMHO, T J'S comment per 2) below that he would make it a seperate add on was > to allay the > concerns of grantnoble and stevehite per 1) below. > > 1) On April 13, and April 14, grantnoble and stevehite submitted the below > descenting comments. > > "I hope this functionality is never implemented. > If one's AFL is that good then just keep it to yourself and make a private > fortune or write a plugin in C/C++ > and sell that (if you can). Tomasz has a great open community in the Yahoo > group and this doesn't promote > a sharing of ideas. I don't see how this benefits anyone other than third > parties who are just looking to make > a quick buck." > > 2) On Apr 25th, 2006, Tomasz Janeczko responded with "This will be made > available as a separate add-on > product" > > I have also attached a wordpad of the all of the Encryption feedbacks that > were posted in response to > Encryption suggestion #51. Ron D >
