Re: [amibroker] Problem with the ZIG( 2nd TIME )

[Mubashar Virk]

I don't know.
Maybe Yves knows something new.


On 12/26/2009 1:50 PM, Graham wrote:

What result do you get from a 200% zig? This makes no sense as you cannot get 200% change to create a peak point.

--
Cheers
Graham Kav
AFL Writing Service
http://www.aflwriting.com <http://www.aflwriting.com>

2009/12/26 Mubashar Virk <mvir...@gmail.com <mailto:mvir...@gmail.com>>



    I think it is the same. Please see:
    Indic = CCI(21) ;
    YL = IIf(Indic>100,100,IIf(Indic<-100,-100,Indic)) ;
    Top1 = PeakBars(YL,200,1) ;//????
    Top2 = PeakBars(YL,200,2) ;//????
    Plot(yl, "Z-CCI", colorRed);
    Plot(Zig(YL,200), "ZIG", colorBlue);
    Plot(TroughBars(YL,200,1)==0, "", colorWhite, styleOwnScale);



    On 12/26/2009 10:18 AM, Yves wrote:

    Indic := CCI(21) ;

    YL:= If(Indic>100,100,

    If(Indic<-100,-100,Indic)) ;

    Top1 := PeakBars(1,YL,200) ;

    Top2 := PeakBars(2,YL,200) ;

    yl;

    Zig(YL,200,%) ;

    {TroughBars(1,YL,200)=0 ;}

    {