droskill,

I wish to address your statement on Telechart about "Major problem - the API to 
access the data via AB doesn't adjust for splits or dividends.  This basically, 
from my point of view, makes it useless for backtesting." 

Telechart already has all of it's data adjusted so there is no need for AB to 
adjust for splits or dividends.

For example, take symbol DUG which is an ultra-short oil & gas fund.  During Q4 
of 2008 this fund had a remarkable net income result due to investments 
internal to the fund.  On Dec 22 it was trading about $35, but after a $6 
dividend payout the next day it opened around $29, a massive change.  You can 
verify this by looking at historical charts at your favorite internet stock 
quote site, many of which show unadjusted data.  But Telechart data has been 
backwards adjusted for this change, so the data is smooth all the way back in 
time, and you won't see a big price change when a big payout occurs.  It may 
take a week or so for your fund data to be adjusted following a payout, but 
they will get it done.  Take a look at DUG in TeleChart at the end of December 
08, and you'll see no $6 gap down.

On the contrary, I find Telechart data excellent and have used it for daily 
backtesting for several years along with DTN IQfeed as a complement for 
intraday data.

--- In [email protected], "droskill" <drosk...@...> wrote:
>
> I've been spending a bit more time with Quotes Plus - pretty good data feed, 
> but there are issues:
> 
> - No lists of the stocks making up S&P500 or other key indices (they do have 
> Nasdaq and NYSE).  This means if you use the S&P, for instance, for looking % 
> of stocks above a moving average, you're going to have to manage the lists 
> yourself.
> - Has fundamentals - this is useful, and the data feed can be used with more 
> fundamentally-oriented scanning software such as HGSI.
> - Has a ton of indices - gold/silver/oil, etc as well as put/call indices, 
> etc.  Premium may have the put/call as well - I'd have to take a look.
> 
> On Premium Data:
> - Fantastic folder breakdown of industries and indices.  So, running a scan 
> over the stocks in the S&P 500 or the S&P 1500 is simple, and will not 
> require maintenance from you.
> - Lacks some basic useful indices out of the box - like those mentioned above 
> (oil/gold/etc).
> - No fundamental data.
> - Great ETF breakdowns into different categories.
> 
> Telechart:
> - Includes access to their online stock tool freestockcharts.com
> - Includes fundamentals
> - Lots of indices and special, TC-only indices like T2106 etc.
> - Major problem - the API to access the data via AB doesn't adjust for splits 
> or dividends.  This basically, from my point of view, makes it useless for 
> backtesting.
> 
> That's what I've got right now - to me it's a toss up between Quotes Plus and 
> Premium.
> 
> --- In [email protected], "droskill" <droskill@> wrote:
> >
> > I think the only other vendor worth looking at is Quotes Plus - just my 
> > opinion.  Anybody have a comparison of the two that has experience with 
> > both?  From my limited experience, QuotesPlus has a bit more extensive 
> > indices, but Premium has it on organization.
> > 
> > --- In [email protected], "louies88" <Louies88@> wrote:
> > >
> > > 
> > > 
> > > --- In [email protected], "patsgreatdeals" <patsgreatdeals@> 
> > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Is there a plugin for AMIBroker? for premiumdata.net?
> > > >
> > > They don't have a plugin in the truest sense, but they have a little 
> > > program that you must install. It has all the necessary structure and 
> > > very well integrated to Amibroker. Everyday you just update the data via 
> > > this little program and...voila...they're updated in your AB database. 
> > > 
> > > Premiumdata.net is very extensive and very good, especially in the sector 
> > > indices. If you're a top-down analyst, you'll like their sector index 
> > > break down. It's very comprehensive. The update, by the way, is very very 
> > > quick compared w/ Amiquote or any other service that relies on Yahoo data.
> > >
> >
>


Reply via email to