Hi,
Nothing wrong with wanting to understand the mechanics. Before getting
into that, however, I did not understand your comment
"it starts to count wrong(should count to 3, but counts to 2 only
considering the 1st triple of crossovers, probably due to initializing
the EMA200) "
What exactly do you mean by that? Can you give a specific example citing
a specific symbol over a specific date range and indicate what you
expected to see vs. what you are seeing?
Looking at your original post;- Your first attempt should not be using
AND. Two separate statements separated by ';' is the correct way to go,
as you had done in the second attempt.
- In your second attempt, you are using the wrong condition for
incrementing Counter. You should be checking for "true" values (i.e. non
zero).
Here is a corrected version of your code. I believe that it will give
you what you want, and, in my tests anyway, line up exactly with the non
looping version that I sent you originally.
/* Option 1
EMA1 = EMA( C, 10 );
EMA2 = EMA( C, 200 );
Plot( EMA1, "EMA10", colorRed, styleLine );
Plot( EMA2, "EMA20", colorBlue, styleLine );

Buycross[0] = 0;
exit[0] = 0;

threshold = 3;
multiplier = 1;

Buycross = Cross( EMA1, EMA2 );
Counter = Cum( Buycross );

// start loop

for ( i = 0; i < BarCount;i++ )
{
     if ( Counter[i] == threshold*multiplier )
     {
         multiplier++;
         exit[i] = 1; // separate statements, not "AND"!
     }
}

printf( "buycross:\n" );

WriteVal( Buycross, 1 );
printf( "counter:\n" );
WriteVal( Counter, 1 );
printf( "multiplier:\n" );
WriteVal( multiplier, 1 );
printf( "exit:\n" );
WriteVal( exit, 1 );
*/


/* Option 2
EMA1 = EMA( C, 10 );
EMA2 = EMA( C, 200 );
Plot( EMA1, "EMA10", colorRed, styleLine );
Plot( EMA2, "EMA20", colorBlue, styleLine );

Buycross[0] = 0;
exit[0] = 0;
COUNTER = 0;
threshold = 3;
multiplier = 1;

Buycross = Cross( EMA1, EMA2 );

// start loop

for ( i = 0; i < BarCount;i++ )
{
     if ( buycross[i] != 0 )   // Check for NOT zero!
     {
         counter++;
     }

     if ( Counter == threshold*multiplier )
     {
         multiplier++;
         exit[i] = 1;
     }
}

printf( "buycross:\n" );

WriteVal( Buycross, 1 );
printf( "counter:\n" );
WriteVal( Counter, 1 );
printf( "multiplier:\n" );
WriteVal( multiplier, 1 );
printf( "exit:\n" );
WriteVal( exit, 1 );
*/
Mike
--- In [email protected], "Matthias" <m.kusche...@...> wrote:
>
>
> Hello,
>
> Thanks to all for the prompt reply. (I just figured out how to format
> this, my 1st post looked a little strange).
>
> EMA1 = EMA(C, 10);
>
> EMA2 = EMA(C, 200);
>
> Buycross = Cross(EMA1, EMA2);
>
> Counter = Cum(Buycross);
>
> Triples = Cross(Counter % 3 == 0, 0);
>
> Plot(EMA1,"EMA10", colorRed,styleLine);
>
> Plot(EMA2,"EMA20",colorBlue,styleLine);
>
> Plot(Triples, "Triples", colorGreen, styleOwnScale | styleHistogram);
>
> This code works absolutely fine, many thanks, only problem here: it
> starts to count wrong(should count to 3, but counts to 2 only
> considering the 1st triplele of crossovers, probably due to
intializing
> the EMA200) any suggestions? But I need you to understand where I am
> coming from:
>
> Obviously you are much more experienced in writing afl than me and I
get
> Mike's basic concept of avoiding loops for proefficient coding and the
> "EMA-plot-labeling" was not correct.
>
> You have to understand that I am trying to realize/code my ideas and
the
> 2nd code is where I started off and probably would start off again, be
> it good or bad programming. I do have your solution to my problem now,
> but I still don't understand why my "concept" does not do the job. Of
> course I did read the articles on "How AFL works", this was were I
> started and also got a hand on the barcount funtion which I thought
was
> the problem (not counting the whole OHLC-array due to faster
processing
> speed). I also asked my brother on this simple one, who is used to
> programming C. As AFL is "C-based" I would have assumed this code
should
> work. Please help me to understand what went wrong / is wrong in my
> logic here, I consider understanding this basic concept to be very
> important for future purpose.
>
> Thanks in advance,
>
> Matthias
>

Reply via email to