FWIW, I agree that a ZZ in points would be a useful, helpful function to have, and that the most logical point of authorship for it is inside the platform.
Why? Because the current internal ZZ in percentages function can be easily tweaked to create the ZZ in points. I've done enough of these (on other platforms) to know that once you have ZZ properly expressed one way (e.g. percentage), then expressing it another way (e.g. points, ticks, dollars) is a small matter, code-wise. Doing it internally will offer the fastest possible performance, will solve the issue for everyone, forever, and will not involve a great deal of work (sorry to pontificate, but that's a truth in this case). Of course, this may not be the -most important- thing to do now, or soon, hence patience is in order, as well as use of the Feedback Center. Moaning and COUNTING won't do any good and aren't really welcomed by the readers/contributors here. But I do think the request has merit, and deserves to be "cranked in" to some future release. - Progster --- In [email protected], Dennis Brown <se...@...> wrote: > > Claude, > > Are you able to modify AFL code? > > If so, then you can write what you want. The Zig function is not able to be > changed directly. However, you could write a suggestion that the ZigA( > Array1, Array2 ) formula be written that allows any array of points to be > used as the criteria. > > The following formula I found with a simple Google search. > > It could be changed from a log to a straight points. On the other hand you > might like it the way it is written: > > http://www.amibroker.com/library/detail.php?id=472 > > Best regards, > Dennis > > > > On Jun 7, 2010, at 1:41 AM, autotrade wrote: > > > > > > > Usually the Zig works with % > > I want to have a formula of the Zig who uses the points not % > > > > Exemple: Zig (ARRAY, Points) > > > > Thank > > > > Claude > > > > > > > > > > > > <imstp_animation_butterflies_fr_020908.gif> > > > > >
