Hi Rob,

They appear to be necessary (because you get a complaint about using
an array in an IF statement without them).  But I don't exactly
understand what is happening.  This would *seem* (somehow) to convert
an array into a Boolean value, which would maybe open up a lot of
other possible IF statements.

Yuki

Sunday, June 13, 2010, 8:17:00 AM, you wrote:

R> They are circular... and as far as I can see, entirely unnecessary. 

R> --- In [email protected], Yuki Taga <yukit...@...> wrote:
>>
>> Hi Rick,
>> 
>> Hey that works for me!  Thanks.  Can you explain for a non programmer
>> what the StrToNum and then NumToStr functions are actually doing in
>> this case?  It seems circular to me (convert a string to a number and
>> then back to a string), so I don't understand what is being
>> accomplished, or why this is necessary.
>> 
>> Yuki
>> 
>> Sunday, June 13, 2010, 5:52:21 AM, you wrote:
>> 
>> RO> Yuki
>> 
>> RO> I have the following code which changes the background gradient
>> RO> color depending on whether a buy or sell signal is given.
>> 
>> RO> if(StrToNum(NumToStr(BuySignal))) 
>> RO> bgColor = ColorRGB(0,66, 2); 
>> RO> else
>> RO> bgColor = ColorRGB(66,2, 0); 
>> RO> SetChartBkGradientFill( colorBlack, bgColor); 
>> 
>> RO>  
>> RO> Perhaps you can change this to meet your needs
>> 
>> RO> Best Regards
>> RO> Rick Osborn
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> RO> ________________________________
>> RO> From: Yuki Taga <yukit...@...>
>> RO> To: [email protected]
>> RO> Sent: Sat, June 12, 2010 1:24:58 AM
>> RO> Subject: [amibroker] impenetrable AFL
>> 
>> RO>   
>> RO> Impenetrable!  (At least to me.)
>> 
>> RO> xcolor = IIf(TSI >= SigLine, SetChartBkGradientFill(
>> RO> ParamColor("BgTop", ColorRGB( 172,172,172 )),
>> RO> ParamColor("BgBottom", ColorRGB( 172,172,172 ))),
>> RO> SetChartBkGradientFill( ParamColor("BgTop", ColorRGB(140,140,140)),
>> RO> ParamColor("BgBottom", ColorRGB(140,140,140))));
>> 
>> RO> SetChartBkColor(SelectedValue(xcolor));
>> 
>> RO> I tried that line above as
>> RO> SetChartBkGradientFill(SelectedValue(xcolor)); but that produced a
>> RO> syntax error.
>> 
>> RO> I think you can see what I'm trying to do here.  The idea is simple:
>> RO> change the background gradient depending on a true/false result.  The
>> RO> gradients in this example are not the gradients I would actually use
>> RO> (in fact they are not gradients at all, as your intelligent eyes will
>> RO> quickly have seen).  They are just test code to see if I can even
>> RO> make it work.  I cannot.
>> 
>> RO> For one thing, the gradient does not change no matter the selected
>> RO> value.  It's static.  For another thing, the margin background goes
>> RO> to black, a hideous (although somewhat foreseen) result.
>> 
>> RO> Okay, what am I doing wrong, and where did I miss this in the docs?
>> RO> And what, if anything, can I do about this margin result?  The only
>> RO> way I can change the *entire* background color is by not using a
>> RO> gradient???  (Using SetChartBkColor) How sad that would be!  I can
>> RO> make that work, at least.  But not with a gradient.
>> 
>> RO> Anything is possible in Amibroker, right?
>> 
>> RO> Wrong?
>> 
>> RO> Thanks,
>> 
>> RO> Yuki
>> 
>> 
>> RO>
>>



 


Reply via email to