Rob I would like a copy. I have been trying to translate EasyLanguage and other code but I just don't understand the math and my attempts just don't look right.
Best Regards Rick Osborn ________________________________ From: Rob <[email protected]> To: [email protected] Sent: Sat, June 26, 2010 4:20:10 AM Subject: [amibroker] Re: New 3rd party toolset for AmiBroker I have the hilbert oscillator & sine wave already coded in AFL if anyone wants them... --- In [email protected], "WiseStockTrader" <wisestocktra...@...> wrote: > > Hello Dennis > > All the indicator formulas execute within about 2 - 4 milliseconds which is > on average about 0.003 seconds. The only exceptions to this are the the > Hilbert Oscillator (7 milliseconds), Sine Wave (38 milliseconds) and > automatic support (90 milliseconds). > > Some functions are a little slower than the native Amibroker versions because > they verify the data supplied to them and because they are variable period > functions so the same optimizations do not apply but I don't think you will > ever notice the difference unless you have a hundred realtime charts open. > > All tests conducted on 2.4ghz Core 2 processor. > > Regards, > Paul > > --- In [email protected], Dennis Brown <see3d@> wrote: > > > > Hello, > > > > I agree with the sentiment below. While it is not unreasonable for a > > specialized tool to cost more than the base product (based on amortizing > > the costs over a smaller user base), there should be a way to test its > > value. In my case, I have written many overlapping functions to these in > > AFL. Speed is my issue. I would love to test the functionality against my > > own versions for speed. I am trying to trade realtime, and I have 2 second > > compute delays. Speeding up my routines is high on my wish list. It would > > take some time and effort on my part just to evaluate its usefulness as > > integrated into my routines. I have already run down the route of > > purchasing a toolbox that could not be returned, only to discover that it > > was useless to me after a lot of effort. Insult added to injury that I > > would not like to repeat. However, I am interested in finding out if it > > can be of value to me. > > > > Best regards, > > Dennis > > > > On Jun 25, 2010, at 10:58 AM, cjdudek wrote: > > > > > Yeah, this looks fairly useful and I don't mind paying for somebody > > > else's code, but not without a free trial like AmiBroker offered, > > > especially considering your "no refund" policy. It's really hard to look > > > at documentation to decide whether or not it's worth $300. I looked at > > > plenty of AmiBroker alternatives that looked good on their web sites but > > > didn't offer the functionality of AmiBroker. I think a product like this > > > might make AmiBroker 10% or 20% more useful, but not 100% more useful, so > > > the price does not seem to reflect the value. If I had a 30-day or even > > > 10-day free trial I might change my mind. > > > > > > --- In [email protected], ram vel <rvlv@> wrote: > > >> > > >> Hi wisestocktrader > > >> Thanks for your info with indepth idea of your toolset. > > >> CAN YOU PLEASE GIVE US LINK FOR HAVING A TRIAL OF YOUR TOOLBOX,PLEASE > > > > > > > > >
