TJ;

That's a good point about SEEK time - I guess if I were to put the data on a 
SSD drive that might cut down some time, but then moving it to a RamDisk might 
help even more.

Thanks
-Glenn


--- In [email protected], Tomasz Janeczko <gro...@...> wrote:
>
> Hello,
> 
> You are dreaming.
> Your new computer is 4 times faster than old one nothing more.
> 
> Run some real-world application that is actually doing something serious 
> CPU and disk intensive
> (like C++ compiler)  and you will see 4 times speed up as well.
> 
> You computer may be faster than that on paper or in certain tasks (like 
> video decoding,
> because of SSE3 support) but from CPU + disk standpoint it is just about 
> 4 times faster
> nothing more. Disk access speeds did NOT improve even 4 times. Your old 
> disk may have
> 20 ms and new may have 16 ms access. Not much improvement. Bulk transfer 
> rates
> do NOT matter at all because with the exception of copying 1GB file disk 
> must
> SEEK and time is spent on seeking rather than transfering data.
> 
> Best regards,
> Tomasz Janeczko
> amibroker.com
> 
> On 2010-06-27 18:06, gmorlosky wrote:
> > Hi TJ;
> >
> > I was saying overall my new system runs other application what seems like 
> > 50 times faster, but as you pointed out I am only getting 4 times faster 
> > compared to that old system.
> >
> > Something isn't right here, it should be a lot faster.
> >
> > Any other thoughts ?
> >
> > Thnaks
> >
> >
> > --- In [email protected], Tomasz Janeczko<groups@>  wrote:
> >    
> >> Hello,
> >>
> >> 2 minutes vs 8 minutes ? That is 4 times not 50% as you say.
> >>
> >> Your new system runs this exploration 4 times faster than old one.
> >> That is actually faster than one could expect.
> >>
> >> Best regards,
> >> Tomasz Janeczko
> >> amibroker.com
> >>
> >> On 2010-06-27 14:26, gmorlosky wrote:
> >>      
> >>> I am very disappointed in the speed I am getting running an Explore in 
> >>> AmiBroker 5.20. Here is my example:
> >>>
> >>> Both units are running the same 32 bit version of Amibroker 5.20, running 
> >>> the same Explore I created, with no other software other than basic 
> >>> antivirus running.
> >>> ***********************************
> >>> Old system (about 7 years):
> >>> Pentium D (single core) 2.4 mhz, 1 gig memory 233 mhz, 5400 rpm drive, 
> >>> Windows XP Pro
> >>>
> >>> Results of Explore (5500 sysmbols):
> >>> CPU usage 100%, 8 minutes 5 seconds
> >>> ***********************************
> >>> New system (about 2 months):
> >>> i7-930 (quad core) 2.6 mhz, 6 gig memory 1600 mhz, 7200 high rpm drive, 
> >>> Windows 7 64 bit
> >>>
> >>> Results of Explore (5500 sysmbols):
> >>> CPU usage 12%, 2 minutes 3 seconds
> >>> ***********************************
> >>> Why so stinking slow ??? when the new system is roughly 50 times faster 
> >>> in overall processing ???
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> ------------------------------------
> >>>
> >>> **** IMPORTANT PLEASE READ ****
> >>> This group is for the discussion between users only.
> >>> This is *NOT* technical support channel.
> >>>
> >>> TO GET TECHNICAL SUPPORT send an e-mail directly to
> >>> SUPPORT {at} amibroker.com
> >>>
> >>> TO SUBMIT SUGGESTIONS please use FEEDBACK CENTER at
> >>> http://www.amibroker.com/feedback/
> >>> (submissions sent via other channels won't be considered)
> >>>
> >>> For NEW RELEASE ANNOUNCEMENTS and other news always check DEVLOG:
> >>> http://www.amibroker.com/devlog/
> >>>
> >>> Yahoo! Groups Links
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>        
> >>      
> >
> >
> >
> > ------------------------------------
> >
> > **** IMPORTANT PLEASE READ ****
> > This group is for the discussion between users only.
> > This is *NOT* technical support channel.
> >
> > TO GET TECHNICAL SUPPORT send an e-mail directly to
> > SUPPORT {at} amibroker.com
> >
> > TO SUBMIT SUGGESTIONS please use FEEDBACK CENTER at
> > http://www.amibroker.com/feedback/
> > (submissions sent via other channels won't be considered)
> >
> > For NEW RELEASE ANNOUNCEMENTS and other news always check DEVLOG:
> > http://www.amibroker.com/devlog/
> >
> > Yahoo! Groups Links
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
>


Reply via email to