Tomasz,

I think your use of the term off-line made me think that you were suggesting 
this approach as when the database is off-line, not processing realtime quotes. 
 If I understood that you were suggesting what is being discussed here, I would 
have taken a keen interest in your suggestion.  Not being familiar with the AA 
operation, I did not make the connection.

Best regards,
Dennis


On Aug 3, 2010, at 8:25 PM, Tomasz Janeczko wrote:

> 
> 
> Hello,
> 
> Quite frankly I was saying that many users abuse chart formulas for doing 
> stuff that should be placed elsewhere.
> I was also recommending to use AA/run-every to process offline instead of 
> putting all code into charts
> long time ago, last time it was here:
> http://finance.groups.yahoo.com/group/amibroker/message/151513
> 
> and here:
> http://finance.groups.yahoo.com/group/AmiBroker-at/message/5131
> 
> but unfortunately no one seemed to be listening.
> 
> Best regards,
> Tomasz Janeczko
> amibroker.com
> 
> On 2010-08-04 01:44, Herman wrote:
>> 
>> The code doesn't execute faster in the AA. You are off-loading processing 
>> from the indicator to the AA, i.e. let the indicator do the plotting and let 
>> the AA do the calculations once a second. This is fast enough because the 
>> only thing that changes on your chart is the last bar and you can keep that 
>> "live" by plotting a single candle indicator.
>> 
>> a very simple example:
>> 
>> AA code, set to Current Symbol, All Quotations, Run-Every to 1 sec, and run 
>> SCAN:
>> 
>> Buy=Sell=Short=Cover=0;
>> StaticVarSet( "BBTop", BBandTop( C, 20, 2 ) );
>> StaticVarSet( "BBBot", BBandBot( C, 20, 2 ) );
>>  
>> Indicator code:
>> 
>> Plot( C, "", 1, 64 ); // this plot is live
>> Plot( StaticVarGet( "BBTop" ), "BBTop", colorBlue, styleLine ); // this 
>> updates 1/sec
>> Plot( StaticVarGet( "BBBot" ), "BBBot", colorBlue, styleLine );
>> 
>> On my computer the Indicator part executes 3x faster plotting speeds up the 
>> Indicator code 3x, AA 0.9 mSec, Indicator 0.3 mSec. Of course the gains 
>> would be much greater with complex code.
>> 
>> If anyone sees something wrong with the AA idea please speak up. It seems to 
>> be too good to be true, usually there is something wrong when things look 
>> too good ;-)
>> I am surprised no one critiqued this idea. There must be a negative side to 
>> this... anyone?
>> 
>> Herman
>> 
>> 
>> > Herman,
>> 
>> > Can you explain a little more about the indicator code vs
>> > AA code... is it identical...? I'm not entirely clear why
>> > it executes so much faster via the AA than an indicator in a chart.
>> 
>> > Many Thanks
>> 
>> > Rob
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> > ------------------------------------
>> 
>> > **** IMPORTANT PLEASE READ ****
>> > This group is for the discussion between users only.
>> > This is *NOT* technical support channel.
>> 
>> > TO GET TECHNICAL SUPPORT send an e-mail directly to 
>> > SUPPORT {at} amibroker.com
>> 
>> > TO SUBMIT SUGGESTIONS please use FEEDBACK CENTER at
>> > http://www.amibroker.com/feedback/
>> > (submissions sent via other channels won't be considered)
>> 
>> > For NEW RELEASE ANNOUNCEMENTS and other news always check DEVLOG:
>> > http://www.amibroker.com/devlog/
>> 
>> > Yahoo! Groups Links
>> 
>> 
>> 
> 
> 
> 

Reply via email to