I don't know Brian:
I feel like it might be necessary to sometimes to be able to
jump in using other modes, such as during an emergency or just because
the wires came untwisted.
I remember when the going got too rough in the old mobile rig, I would
just send CW with the mike button to let everyone know I was still
listings, and a few hundred miles down the road the conditions would get
better or I would sign out and tell them (in CW) I was going to get a
motel. In those days everyone spoke CW.
73, John, WA5BXO
-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Brian Carling
Sent: Sunday, September 08, 2002 8:32 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [AMRadio] Subbands and FCC
Given the fact that CW and digital modes are needing less and less
bandwidth
thanks to the marvellous efficiency of modes like PSK31, there ought to
be some
kind of allocation that allows for more phone,
but specifically more space for AM fone!
I think it would be GREAT if we had a whole swath of say 50 kHz of width
that was
designated as AM ONLY - no SSB, no CW no digital,
NO kids NO lids (grin!)
On 8 Sep 2002 at 20:26, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Don: Re the last paragraph.......I agree that we need to have a
> smaller
> CW subband, say 50 KHz on each band due to the nunber of users of
> CW. Then lets use the same logic in selecting an AM band. Based on
> the number of active AM'ers, how many KHz do you think we deserve??
>
> 73 DE Charlie, K0NG, AM since 55, still even.
_______________________________________________
AMRadio mailing list
[email protected]
http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/amradio
