Hi Jim, 

Thanks again for the information-packed emails!

Regarding the "modulation xfmrs" the primaries opened up on both units.
Don't know why. I never used this particular unit except to test it out
when I first bought it (I bought both my CE20A's from the same guy, at
the same time, at one of the famous Deearfield, NH hamfests in the
80's). I remember at that time I had audio, but the sideband supression
wasn't nearly as good as in the second unit, and it resisted any
attempts to adjust/improve it (maybe one of the 2 transformers was dead
then, in which case it would be transmitting DSBSC, in which case, no
wonder I was having problems nulling out the unwanted sideband!) so it
sat on the shelf until I tried to fire it up last year, at which time I
had no audio at all. When I looked into it, I found both primaries open. 

Interestingly, In my junquebox I had several (4 or 5) of these same
transformers among a box of stuff given to me over the years. Among
these, all had open primaries except one! So I have one spare xfmr, but
need one more to fix the rig. Alternately, a matching set of hi-Z: 600
ohm output xfmrs would probably work too.

My carrier null appears stable enough. It is a touchy adjustment, tho.

Thanks also for the (later) Email on the 7591 sources.

73,
-Larry/NE1S

Jim Candela wrote:
> 
>         Larry,
> 
>         One of the features of the 20A that motivates me to use this as an
> AM rig is the stability of the VFO, and heterodyne scheme. No more 160 / 40
> meter VFO which gets multiplied for 160-10 meter coverage. I hate that
> feature on most commercial AM rigs. Also the tune, or Cal function is handy
> for precise zeroing of the received frequency. The variable level is also
> nice to get the spot signal level similar to the received station. US Amers
> often have trouble spotting, and then staying on frequency. The 20A solves
> these problems quite nicely. You could use a 20A as a carrier exciter (no
> modulation) to a big plate modulated rig.
> 
>         I have run some SSB with my 20A recently. Everyone is amazed at the
> quality of this thing on SSB. I guess part of it is the phasing set-up, and
> part of it is the linearity of the 7591's. There are some major shortcoming
> of the 20A on SSB however. The carrier null circuit is not the most stable.
> Mine is worsened because the 1K pots (2) are worn out, and need to be
> replaced. The adjustment is too coarse for me. Also, if you put a variac on
> the 20A power, the carrier null moves around with line voltage. A 5 volt
> change in ac line voltage will move the carrier null significantly. Maybe my
> 20A is still busted somehow. Does yours do the same?
> 
> Here is what I plan to do:
> 
> *       Replace the carrier null pots with 1K Cermit 10 turn pots. Mouser
> has some that are chassis mount.
> *       Identify the source of drift.
> *       If the drift is filament voltage to the 6U8 / 6Ba7, then I can run
> that off regulated 6 Vdc with a 7806 regulator. If I go that way, I might
> also regulate the filament to the 12AT7 audio stage in the 90 degree phase
> shift network.
> *       If the drift is plate voltage (more likely) then I am thinking about
> making a LV B+ regulator. That 1K 20 watt resistor in my power supply (part
> of C-L-C-R-C mentioned below) could get replaced with a series regulator
> tube like a 6AS7, or 6DQ6. This tube should go where the 5u4G once went.
> Maybe I can find a 5 volt filament tube for this task. Did they make any 5
> volt filament sweep tubes? Since I also solid stated the bias rectifier, a
> 5651 reference tube could go where the 6AL5 once was. I would need another
> socket for a dual triode (6SN7? 6SL7?) control tube. Maybe that could go
> where the VOX anti-trip module went.
> 
>         Back to the external B+ booster. My first attempt was using a tiny
> 115v/115v 15 va isolation transformer. It works fine, but the B+ boost is
> only a little over 100 Volts loaded at 150 ma 7591 total plate current. This
> is a compromise, and could be easily mounted inside the 20a chassis. Put a
> diode across the output (back biased), and a switch to the AC primary to the
> transformer. The switch could be labeled low B+ / Hi B+.
>         When I key up my 20A on am without the high B+ on, the scope shows
> severe clipping on the mod+ peaks. This is because the carrier is set too
> high. Instead of backing off the carrier, I turn on the 200V Kepco (has two
> 6550's in a series regulator), and the Modulation peaks now run up to 120+%
> with no clipping. This is a huge "bang for the buck" modification,
> especially if you are trying to drive a grounded grid linear amplifier.
> 
> Good luck with all your projects...
> 
> PS How did your 20A modulation transformers fail?
> 
> 73,
> Jim Candela
> WD5JKO
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Larry Szendrei [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Sent: Tuesday, December 24, 2002 11:03 PM
> > To: Jim Candela
> > Subject: Re: CE20A mods for QRO
> >
> >
> > Wow, Jim, thanks for all the info! You've given me a lot to chew on, and
> > yes, it is quite helpful.
> >
> > I've only run my 20A on AM once, just a couple of weeks ago on 160M. But
> > everyone in the QSO was on their way out, so I didn't get much in the
> > way of reports. I don't remember if I had the 'scope on at the time
> > (should have!).
> >
> > I run mainly AM here, but have lots of other rigs I can use on AM that
> > are better suited to the mode. My main interest in the CE20A is for
> > sideband and RTTY. I've run my functional stock unit on 160M - 15M SSB
> > with no problems - my VFO-458 doesn't have the 10M converter in it, but
> > I plan to build one someday.
> >
> > Youv'e got me fired up to fix and start playing with the other CE20A -
> > but I've got several other, unfinished projects I need to wrap up before
> > I embark on any new adventures. Plus a guitar amp and PA amp that need
> > fixing. You know how it is, I'm sure.
> >
> > Regarding the 10K resistor accross the mixer tank - isn't it's purpose
> > to "de-Q" the tank, so that the next stage doesn't oscillate in TPTG
> > fashion? I'm surprised you could get away with removing it. Yep, I would
> > expect you got more signal with it gone.
> >
> > I don't think I'll worry about an external supply. I'll be happy with
> > ~40W PEP if I can get that after changing finals.
> >
> > Gonset GSB-201, eh? My other vintage SSB rig is a GSB-100.
> >
> > 73 and thanks for taking the time to answer in such detail.
> >
> > -Larry/NE1S
> >
> > Jim Candela wrote:
> > >
> > >         Larry,
> > >
> > >         I chose the 7591 because I have several, and they are
> > about the same Gm as
> > > a 6AG7. That means the drive requirement is similar for Ab1
> > operation. I did
> > > have to increase the G1 bias, and to fill out the AB1 range, I
> > removed the
> > > 10K resistor across the 6BA7 mixer tank circuit (it's hidden up
> > top), and
> > > the available drive increased noticeably. The mixer circuit has
> > significant
> > > modifications from CE between the early rigs, and the late
> > 20A's. Mine is
> > > the old version. The newer version has cathode bias on the 6BA7, and
> > > significant mods to the 12BH7 cathode follower. I see why
> > because mine has
> > > reduced output drive to the 7591's as you go up to 10 meters. With the
> > > 6AG7's in there, I could get 1/2 watt output on 10 meters, and
> > the 7591's
> > > didn't change that. My VFO has the optional 10 meter circuitry, so drive
> > > from the VFO is fine.
> > >
> > >         I have had no instability unless I have so much RF in
> > the shack that I get
> > > RF burns from the D-104 screen. I run mine so far out of the case, and
> > > without the screen above the final cage. No tendency to oscillate, or be
> > > unstable. Both the 7591, and 7868 have two G2 connections at
> > the base. This
> > > allows for redundant G2 bypassing. I am very happy with the changes thus
> > > far. I can now drive my Gonset GSB-201 to 150 watts output on
> > AM, whereas
> > > before 30 watts out is all I could muster when the 20A was stock..
> > >
> > >         With the 6AG7's on 160, 80, 20, I could get about 12
> > watts out, or about 3
> > > watts AM. On 40 meters, the VFO must triple, so drive can be a problem.
> > > There is a CE endorsed mod to the VFO to help out there. With
> > that mod, 40
> > > meters comes in the same. The output on 15 meters is a little squirrelly
> > > (rich in spurs). I haven't perused fixing 15 meters however.
> > >
> > >         Well back to the 7591. I was actually looking at the
> > 7868 with envy because
> > > of the very low Cgp, but the Novar socket requirement stopped
> > me. Surplus
> > > sales of Nebraska has a nice ceramic Novar socket that isn't
> > too expensive.
> > > The 7591 is electrically similar, but with Octal socket. You must rewire
> > > from the 6AG7 pinout. It's pretty easy... The 7591 is the same size as a
> > > 6V6, so the size is kind of nice. There isn't much room in
> > there, so a fat
> > > tube like a 6DQ6 may be a challenge to remove (if it fits at
> > all!). I also
> > > like the linearity of the Hi-Fi audio tube. The EL-34 you mention is a
> > > possible contender, and it is skinny too. A grid driven sweep
> > tube may not
> > > be very linear, or have enough gain. I don't know though,
> > because I never
> > > tried them.
> > >
> > >         I currently have my 20A P/S solid stated. The capacitor
> > input pi filter is
> > > still there. I added a 1K 20 watt resistor, and another 40 uf 450 volt
> > > capacitor following the Pi C-L-C filter, so I know have a
> > C-L-C-R-C filter.
> > > I run all the low level stuff off the 1K feed. This gives me
> > about 300v B+
> > > (key up), and 275 (key down max carrier). The output from the
> > C-L-C is 400v
> > > (key up), and 375v (key down max carrier). The output from the
> > C-L-C Pi also
> > > goes to the 7591 screen grids (G2). Here is where I get crazy.
> > I then take
> > > an external 200v (rack mount Kepco regulated) P/S, and add it to the pi
> > > C-L-C output. This gives me 575 volts for the 7591 plates. This is just
> > > above the max rating for the tube, so no big deal. The 7591's
> > give me about
> > > 30 watts carrier output on 160-80 meters at 375 v B+, and about
> > 45 watts at
> > > 575 v B+. Since the HV B+ increases some at reduced load, I can
> > get close to
> > > 60 watts PEP output from my 20A. That means that 15 watts AM is
> > possible. I
> > > like to keep it below that for pos+ peak headroom. If you add
> > an external
> > > P/S like I did, put a diode across it's output (back biased by
> > the 200V).
> > > That way if the 200V is off, you still get the 375-400V to the
> > 7591 plates.
> > > You don't want to ruin these tubes by running with G2 on, and the plates
> > > off. I adjusted the bias (g1) for about 60 ma idle current.
> > This takes about
> > > 18-20 volts of bias to get there.
> > >
> > >         On the subject of pos + expansion, my 20A, and every
> > other one I have heard
> > > on AM sounds a little "clicky" whenever the neg- mod peak goes
> > beyond 100%.
> > > Instead of just cutting off the carrier like a plate modulated rig, the
> > > phase reverses 180 degrees, and we make nasty DSBRC. I have found a way
> > > around this. On the rear of the 20A there is a RCA phone jack for audio
> > > output. This same signal is used on AM to drive the upper balanced
> > > modulator. The impedance is low, and the 1n34a diodes are non
> > linear. This
> > > results in asymmetrical modulation where the neg- peak hits
> > 100% when the
> > > mod+ peak is only at about 50%. It looks like [EMAIL PROTECTED] on the
> > scope, and on the
> > > air whenever you crank the audio just a little bit to get
> > through QRN. Here
> > > is what I do. Take a low drop diode, and put the cathode at the
> > RCA center
> > > pin, and return the anode to ground through a 15 ohm resistor.
> > This seems to
> > > balance the circuit, and sine wave testing shows symmetrical
> > audio up to +/-
> > > 80%. Beyond that the mod + goes further to beyond 100% (depends
> > on carrier
> > > output power), and the mod- clips at about 85% without ever hitting the
> > > baseline causing DSB. The difference in your station monitor
> > will be night
> > > and day. You can now compete with the plate modulation rigs. In
> > fact if you
> > > cut the power in half (7 watts in my rig), the dam thing looks like a
> > > ultra-modulated rig on the scope. On my 20A I wired the diode
> > into the mode
> > > switch (there are extra contacts) so that it is only there for
> > AM. I started
> > > out using germanium diodes. I have some 1n270's. Two in
> > parallel did pretty
> > > good, but the diode knee is sloppy. Maybe more in parallel
> > would be better.
> > > I abandoned them when I found some 1n5818's. These are Schotty,
> > and one is
> > > all I need.
> > >
> > >         There is room to explore this subject further..and I
> > welcome your comments.
> > > please share them with the group.
> > >
> > >         Well Larry, I hope this helps!
> > >
> > > Regards,
> > > Jim
> > >
> > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > From: Larry Szendrei [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > > Sent: Tuesday, December 17, 2002 9:24 PM
> > > > To: Jim Candela
> > > > Subject: CE20A mods for QRO
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Hi Jim,
> > > >
> > > > I read one of your posts on your mods to the CE20A to increase output
> > > > power. I have two 20A's, one which works fine that I'll keep
> > stock, and
> > > > one I need to repair (open primaries on both "modulation
> > transformers")
> > > > that I would like to experiment with to increase the output as you've
> > > > done.
> > > >
> > > > I'm interested as to why you chose the 7591A - I know it's a
> > > > single-ended high transconductance beam power tube capable of
> > some poop,
> > > > but it's also quite rare and expensive. I was thinking of a
> > pair of 6DQ6
> > > > sweep tubes (moderately high Gm around 7000, or so, as I
> > recall, and it
> > > > shouldn't be too difficult to adapt the CE20A for this configuration,
> > > > since the plate tank components are above chassis already),
> > or maybe the
> > > > EL34.
> > > >
> > > > Did you have to add neutralization? If so, how did you do it?
> > I think CE
> > > > could get away without neutralization with the 6AG7's because it is a
> > > > "well screened" pentode, but Ggp is typically high enough to require
> > > > neutralization with the beam power tubes. Do you have any
> > problems with
> > > > instabilities on the higher bands?
> > > >
> > > > Thanks, and I'll be very interested to hear the details.
> > > >
> > > > 73,
> > > > -Larry/NE1S
> > > >
> > > > ---------------------------------------------
> > > > Introducing NetZero Long Distance
> > > > 1st month Free!
> > > > Sign up today at: www.netzerolongdistance.com
> >
> > ---------------------------------------------
> > Introducing NetZero Long Distance
> > 1st month Free!
> > Sign up today at: www.netzerolongdistance.com
> 
> --- StripMime Report -- processed MIME parts ---
> multipart/mixed
>   text/plain (text body -- kept)
>   application/ms-tnef
> The reason this message is shown is because the post was in HTML
> or had an attachment. Attachments are not allowed.
> Please post in Plain-Text only.---
> _______________________________________________
> AMRadio mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/amradio
---------------------------------------------
Introducing NetZero Long Distance
1st month Free!
Sign up today at: www.netzerolongdistance.com

Reply via email to