I agree to some points on that one. Several of my ham friends use CW
as the 'fun' part of the hobby, and these guys will keep doing so. I
see the CW requirement may go away, but will it really lessen the
amount of CW traffic? I talked this over with alot of people at
ham-com, and some of them said that they did learn CW in order to move
to general, but do not prefer it, rather they are interested in
digital or SSTV, or (ugh) SSB.. Others said that once they tried it,
they really like it. 

One elderly friend of mine can't pound the brass any more, so he uses
his computer to transmit, and his ears to receive. (he's also one of
the 'crabby old guys' that says "CW keeps the riff raff out") But I
have alot of respect for him, so I don't argue the point. 

When I pick up some SSB, the discussion is seldom technical, but like
someone mentioned, it's about the dog, the car, the weather, etc. 

When I pick UP AM, it's more technical, usually about the rig, changes
to the rig, so and so added a choke here or there in the modulator,
what's the plate voltage on the 250TH, etc. I like the
experimentation, the merging of a high power, low distortion audio
amplifier with an efficient RF amplifier. I have a spare Altec 1570B
audio power amplifier running two 811's, in a class-B circuit. I think
I can maybe apply this to my Link 250UFS tranciever and do some 6M AM. 

I can say that CW and AM seem to go well together, if you have a notch
filter or a variable width IF. You can either 'notch in' the CW signal
that is close to a sideband of the AM signal, or 'notch out'/move your
passband  away from the nearby CW signal to where you are listening
mostly to one of the AM sidebands. I have sliced many AM signals this
way on ye olde R390, using an old spectrum analyzer hooked to the IF
out, to elimiate a nearby stronger signal. I know this does not always
work, but I threw it out there anyway.

Most of my CW-friends use 40 and 20M. I think CW is a mode that will
always be here, just like AM and classical RTTY. It might become a
mode which is more for pleasure, which is definitely where AM and the
ye olde ASR-33's are now, but its usefulness will never be
overshadowed in difficult conditions. I would like to see a heads up
comparison of something like PSK31 and CW during poor conditions, just
to see.

Reply via email to