73s to all, looking for a tube type rf signal gen up to about 30Mhz. Replies if any at:[EMAIL PROTECTED] tnx, Chris SV1DAF. From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Jan 14 16:15:49 2005 Return-Path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> X-Original-To: [email protected] Delivered-To: [email protected] Received: from web52805.mail.yahoo.com (web52805.mail.yahoo.com [206.190.39.169]) by mailman.qth.net (Postfix) with SMTP id 5955F859C03 for <[email protected]>; Fri, 14 Jan 2005 16:15:43 -0500 (EST) Received: (qmail 27352 invoked by uid 60001); 14 Jan 2005 21:11:04 -0000 Comment: DomainKeys? See http://antispam.yahoo.com/domainkeys DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; b=rHS1FOzacE9n06xYJ7Vla9IX3u00mXL6F9d3OCFCwQK4YPCSLzCcCUfQYN3K3tqhv/AIXqWUz9dyzF/EBnhlDQ5315u05lYNzPAxYRr33B2tXzNwAFxVSiYD0VDljOjilvA4X02bR5dgS0DqF4WlKVGCRPTErcyllu70/f1ZBG0 ; Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from [64.236.240.190] by web52805.mail.yahoo.com via HTTP; Fri, 14 Jan 2005 13:11:04 PST Date: Fri, 14 Jan 2005 13:11:04 -0800 (PST) From: P Cour <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [email protected] In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Subject: [AMRadio] ARRL's Threatened Bandwidth Petition - action taken? X-BeenThere: [email protected] X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.4 Precedence: list Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], Discussion of AM Radio <[email protected]> List-Id: Discussion of AM Radio <amradio.mailman.qth.net> List-Unsubscribe: <http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/amradio>, <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> List-Archive: <http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/private/amradio> List-Post: <mailto:[email protected]> List-Help: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> List-Subscribe: <http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/amradio>, <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 14 Jan 2005 21:15:49 -0000
I understand the February issue of QST briefly mentions that the League has scuttled the idea of petitioning the FCC to segregate our modes and activities by bandwidth. If this group has indeed abandoned the idea, it will have been the result of public protest against such a scheme, which the League had aired as a draft proposal to elicit comment. As far as I know, the group in Newington has never revealed the specific comments submitted to its volunteeer administrators and/or paid staff. Nor has the group even offered a tally of pro and con sentiment. Anyone on here already have the issue to affirm/dispute word the ARRL may have seen the light? __________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Mail - You care about security. So do we. http://promotions.yahoo.com/new_mail
