I applaud those 3 for even trying to bring a point into a den of discussion that mainly comprises personal agenda and typical ARRL bashing. I think I'll sit back and see what the FCC's action is on this proposal and the one that was already submitted in June. The FCC has already indicated that the present Part 97 rules lack clarity and, in some cases, impede the operation of new modes on our amateur bands. If nothing else, I'm sure over the next several years, we'll see changes made to various sections of Part 97 governing our amateur service. The dabble on QRZ just adds to the amusement.
Pete, wa2cwa On Sun, 04 Dec 2005 23:21:15 -0500 "Brian Carling" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On 4 Dec 2005 at 21:15, peter markavage wrote: > > > These "rejectors" of the proposal account for less than > > .1% of the ham population > > Yes and the proponents in that discussion (3, I think) comprise > about > 0.000006% of the USA amateur population. > > The nays have it. The burden of proof is on anyone who wants this > absurd > turkey of a proposal left over from Thanksgiving (grin!)
